It seems perfectly obvious that she was in the know of her husband’s doings.

If so, I think that she should be prosecuting for living off the fruit of crime.

In my eyes she is as guilty as her husband, so the least she can do is shut up.

As someone once said, Mrs Camilleri we are not amused.

Furthermore we do not care less what happens to you and your like.

[Daphne – My point, David, is that Mrs Imniehru Camilleri is not a victim of crime but an active participant in it. When people rang the doorbell of their home to buy cocaine, did she sit inside and say ‘Oh darling, there’s somebody at the door. I wonder what he wants!” And did she refuse the money that came from crime or did she live off it gladly?]

Was she ever victim to the crime of usury? or did she experience it from the other side of the fence? My final question to the allegation that victims of crime are not protected. Is she saying this out of what she used to experience when her beloved used to threaten and blackmail people?

Is she saying this from the other side of the fence where she could have been witnessing people being bullied? What is her contribution toward victims of crime going to be?