You really don’t get it. So here is an example that excludes any questions of morality. It might help, but given your comments, maybe not.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/health-minister-sussan-ley-under-pressure-over-gold-coast-home-purchase-20170106-gtn7ye.html
This minister had to resign over buying a house whilst on the Gold Coast on ministerial duties.

Moral equivalence is not an issue. That’s a primary concern only for the religiously obsessed and intellectual wankers.

It is not Cardona’s morals that matter. It is the fact that he is a government minister representing the EU presidency at an EU summit in Germany where he is a guest of the German government and yet he spends his evening in a brothel in a threesome with his crony appointee.

BECAUSE HE IS NOT A CABINET MINISTER, REUBEN. I DON’T CARE WHETHER MEN VISIT BROTHELS. I AM NOT THEIR WIFE. I CARE WHETHER CABINET MINISTERS VISIT BROTHELS. WHEN THEY CEASE TO BE CABINET MINISTERS, I WILL CEASE TO CARE.

If we’re discussing what should and what shouldn’t be done we’re necessarily discussing ethics and morality. Your source knows that his/her identity will remain secret, so s/he knew there was no risk there. I think it’s quite hypocritical oh him/her, actually. I still fail to see why s/he is different to Cardona.

That shows you don’t get what it’s all about. It’s not about a man in a brothel. It’s about a cabinet minister in a brothel, and more pertinently, a cabinet minister who is a guest of the German government and who abuses of that hospitality to visit whores.

He cannot be in a brothel AND understand why Chris Cardona shouldn’t be there.