Indiana Jones and the Temple of Hogwash
Astrid and friends have discovered the old drainage system beneath St George’s Square. The amazing discovery was made by public works employees last Tuesday, acting on the advice and guidance of FAA and its B-movie tag-line ‘Who knows what lies beneath?’.
The discovery has been heralded as a triumph for civil society, the words ‘civil society’ having become interchangeable, in the vocabulary of Flimkien Ghal Ambjent Ahjar, with its own acronym.
Somebody please tell this woman and her friend Francesca Meilaq, who thinks that all tapestries were made by Gobelins and that all underground museums face the same problems as Egyptian desert tombs, that the drains have been there for the last 450 years and everybody with one brain cell jigging about in his skull knew about them. Why? Because the presence of drains beneath a city built by command in the late 16th century is taken for granted, especially when that city was built by a military order with a military purpose and using military engineers. Many people knew exactly What Lay Beneath even if civil society did not. Let’s put it this way, I don’t need to dig up the lane leading to my house to prove to myself that drains Lie Beneath. And if some farmer accidentally digs through one, my reaction will not be: “Wow, drains! I knew it! What a discovery.”
The drains were not ‘discovered’ (and certainly not by people as full of shit as they once were). They have been uncovered. The two words have different meanings, but a bachelor’s degree in English is as nothing when there is misinformation to be spread.
From the news reports:
“Archaeological studies in St George Square, Valletta have revealed an undocumented network of tunnels which possibly connect to the Palace. They were discovered on Tuesday.”
“The FAA had pointed out the existence of the passageway during a meeting with Rural Affairs and Resources Minister George Pullicino, who briefed the organisation on the square’s embellishment plans.”
5 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
Bongu Daphne?
What do you think of Mr Vince farrugia’s candidacy with the PN?
[Daphne – I’m not going to repeat myself. Scroll back through weeks of posts and you will find it. There’s also an amusing video called Mr Toupee Wearer.]
Meanwhile, in Poland, this is the sort of thing they find when excavating to build a city hotel
http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/27/europe/27poland.php
Your attempts not to comment on Vince Farrugia’s candidacy are clear indications that you really can’t exonerate our dear PM this time round.
[Daphne – I have commented, Gerald. Look up the post. I find the subject extremely boring. My opinion can be summed up in one line: I don’t approve of Vince Farrugia, I will never forgive him for sabotaging the government in 1996 and almost putting an end to EU membership, and I don’t respect him. The Nationalist Party is free to select him. I am free not to vote for him. My view is not unique.]
Gerald, as a self-appointed fanatic/follower of the ‘old self-centred ladies club’, with all your “go, go, go Astrid” patronage, I wish you luck in your next endeavour. Astrid, Benoit and their dull friends need a lot of constant admiration, and you might fit in perfectly. After your banking, music, ‘journalistic’ and whatever else milestones, this one might be the most challenging and rewarding for your kind of personality.
P Shaw – Don’t forget his insurance stint