And here's Charlon Gouder's other cop-turned-lawyer, partying with Robert Musumeci

Published: March 3, 2010 at 8:26pm
L to R - Sharon Ellul Bonici, Robert Musumeci, Andy Ellul, and Andy's woman. Consie is in the lavatories, adjusting her mask.

L to R - Sharon Ellul Bonici, Robert Musumeci, Andy Ellul, and Andy's woman. Consie is in the lavatories, adjusting her mask.

See my previous post. Now here is Charlon Gouder’s other cop-turned-lawyer, Andy Ellul – one of the two who filed a police complaint against me on his behalf – having fun at a New Year’s Eve masked ball with Robert Musumeci.

The masked ball was organised by Magistrate Consuelo Herrera.




23 Comments Comment

  1. Banquo says:

    PBS are saying the magistrate appeared before the Commission for the Administration of Justice.

  2. Banquo says:

    Why did they give out this news only today? It would seem the magistrate appeared before the Commission in mid-February.

    What was the reason this news was kept hidden for so long? Is the magistrate being given protection?

    • Alan says:

      An on-line protest document should be created, “signatures” collected, and sent straight to the President ….. also head of the Commission.

      We are not mushrooms, to be kept in the dark & fed sh*t.

      All these people get their salaries from our taxes for heaven’s sake.

      We have the RIGHT to know what was / is being done about Magistrate Scerri Herrera.

  3. JC says:

    To say the very least, being called in for questioning by such an authoritative body is an embarrassment in itself.

    I would hate to be in her shoes.

  4. john says:

    I never did think much of the law course – now I know why. It seems that the entrance requirements are that one has to be either a cop or a Super One employee.

  5. Anthony says:

    Is PBS contradicting the President? Is this all spin? Who is protecting who? Are they taking notes or are they hauling the judiciary before the Commission? What the hell is going on? This is the country’s entire legal set-up we are dealing with not the Eurovision Song Contest.

  6. Lrak says:

    Quo vadis Robert? Mn’Alla ma tlajtx.

  7. lino says:

    John, I agree with your appraisal of the law course, but eventually that’s where the power is. They legislate, defend, prosecute, judge cases, and judge appeals. You can imagine if lawyers are not inherently honest, the kind of mess they can cause in a system, especially if the dishonest ones form cliques. In a lawyer’s office, on a porcelain novelty, I once read,”guai a chi cade nelle mani d’un avvocato”. That just about explains it.

  8. Ciccio2010 says:

    No wonder some people think they are above the law. They have cops, lawyers, magistrates or judges as friends.
    On second thoughts, I would make it mandatory for cops, lawyers, magistrates and judges to have a Facebook account, so that everyone knows who is in their circle…

    • GPA says:

      That’s what I thought, too. The Commission for the Administration of Justice moved very quickly to stop the general public from getting to know what they’re up to, but did absolutely nothing to deal with the rot. But as long as its chairperson is “close to the people”… who cares?

  9. Michael A. Vella says:

    Lino:”You can imagine if lawyers are not inherently honest, the kind of mess they can cause in a system,”

    No need to imagine, Lino; just take a look at the judiciary and you can see the actual thing – no less than 8 out of the 40 odd have so far gone off the rails – some completely so, others to varying degrees.

  10. eros says:

    I agree with Alan. Somebody should create an on-line petition in support of the right of the media to expose cases where public personalities, who should know better, have made fools of themselves.

    I am very much afraid that the judiciary and the police are suffering a massive panic attack and re-grouping to fend off any serious investigation which could possibly result in them losing some more of what’s left of their credibility.

    Talk of power of incumbency! It’s a shame that serious journalists (and there are quite a number of them around, believe me) have not themselves joined forces to support one of their colleagues who, on exposing misdemeanours by a member of the judiciary, finds herself the subject of an investigation instead.

    Any of you reading this – aren’t you all ashamed? Next time it will be you – the PL hate machine has no boundaries.

    • Hmmm says:

      Except where one of their own is concerned.

    • Alan says:

      At the same time, I find it strange that there has been no “leak” from anyone about what the commission has been up to regarding Scerri Herrera.

      • Hmmm says:

        There was a report on PBS last night. The commission normally meets once a month. There was an extra session in mid-February that dealt with Magistrate Scerri Herrera.

      • john says:

        Bocca went out for a leak.

  11. pippo says:

    Nahseb li il-president u ic-chairman tal-kummisjoni ghandu test iebes issa kif ser jagixxi, jekk veru irrid ikun qrib tal poplu kif dejjem stqarr. Mela sur president, naddaf dak il-hmieg li hemm u nibqaw nammirrawk.

  12. I’ve been wondering why ABC isn’t commenting on this tragic/hilarious/serious/dangerous situation.
    Now I’m thinking it’s because he’s on the Commission for the Administration of Justice.

  13. Etienne Caruana says:

    What’s happened to the Whistleblower (protection?) Act? Does it cover issues such as those presently under discussion? Any info?

  14. jowsef says:

    Andy x’ghandu hiereg fuq rasu? Qrun?

Leave a Comment