Does anyone have a large rainproof condom for Charlon Gouder?
Published:
March 8, 2010 at 7:05am
And another one for his Super One camera?
After all, Julia Farrugia ta’ Saviour Balzan and the Institute of Maltese Journalists went to SO much trouble to raise money for that camera, taking her clothes off on Comino in winter, that we wouldn’t want it to get ruined now, would we?
Meanwhile, a plastic bag should do nicely to keep Kurt Farrugia and Byon Jo safe from the rain – together. But somebody should tell Byon Jo to avoid wearing it with a white tie.
I trust Byon Jo and Charlon aren’t scared of umbrellas.
17 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
Watch crack journalist and the editor of the “independent” newspaper Illum Julia take a dip in the cold winter sea for a noble cause – raising money for the cash-stripped PL! Julia appears after about 50 secs so FF it if you can’t control your nausea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It9KEY7IYMs&feature=PlayList&p=7E724FC8EF80DE20&index=3
NB – Warning to pervs – don’t waste your time.
Thanks for the link, Peter.
What was Joseph Chetcuti, the violin-playing lawyer of Yes to Europe fame, doing on Comino raising funds for the PL?
Ara veru nqalbet ta’ taħt fuq din l-art ħelwa!
Dak ghandu “Arani issa” fuq Super One.
Unfuckingbelievable! What a prize group of tossers!
So they went for a dip on a sunny December day in Comino. Very impressive.
It makes a mockery out of the plight of the many potential immigrants who brave the cold, wild December weather, doesn’t it?
Thanks for the warning.
Bags like this carry an ego-tax.
Ara ftit Noel Arrigo…
Any news on today’s sitting?
Have you seen this?
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100308/local/magistrate-to-file-new-complaint-against-caruana-galizia-after-court-incident
Charity parties? Fantastic!
http://roflrazzi.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/celebrity-pictures-pigs-in-space-swine-flu.jpg
is it true that you have been stopped writing about the Cons saga by order of the Court. The Times reported that the magistrate did not accept her request for a ban on your writing against her. But according to Di-ve the magistrate has accepted to ban you from continuing writing about her. Which version is the true one?
[Daphne – Di-Ve is wrong.]
Daphne, For the avoidance of doubt. From the quote below, I take it that the court allowed that anyone can continue to comment on any blog, including this one, about the magistrate. I thought the English was a bit con-voluted.
“The court turned down a request to issue a protection order for the magistrate by ordering a ban on the publication of blogs mentioning the magistrate.”
[Daphne – The court turned down her request for what would have been a gagging order. The magistrate said that there are free speech implications which cannot be ignored.]
Oh, we’ve got one magistrate who knows what he is doing!
Fejn kien dak il-bravu Charlon illum? Aktar ma jidher aktar jaqa ghaz-zufjett.
Forsi kien qieghed jiehu rapport f’kawza ohra:
http://www.maltarightnow.com/?module=news&at=Kunsillier+Laburista+l%2DQorti+fuq+frodi&t=a&aid=99819091&cid=19