Guest Post: The New Dry Docks
Note to Kurt Farrugia: guest post means that I didn’t write this.
Note to Jason Micallef: this isn’t a recipe.
Note to Charlon Gouder: I drove past one in pink hot-pants on my way to the printers yesterday.
————-
Going by the ‘reactions’ to the Budget being reported in the newspapers, we certainly live in a bubble in Malta. And what passes as ‘reaction’ by the ‘constituted bodies’ and the ‘social partners’ is mostly self-serving attempts to take even more dosh off Joe Taxpayer.
That’s why we have Joseph Muscat talking as if most of Europe were in benign-growth mode rather than at the edge of a debt cliff.
That’s why we have the GWU shooting down our version of the ‘scala mobile’.
And that’s why we have the MHRA asking for even more subsidies.
Yes, asking for even more subsidies. As it is, our hoteliers have very successfully convinced all of Malta that tourists need to be subsidised and their accommodation must be treated as an essential item enjoying a special concession for the poor.
Up to December, hoteliers enjoy a special subsidy in a reduced VAT rate of 5% on tourist accommodation. This is 13 percentage points less than the normal 18% VAT rate which any other business would face on its sales, bar essential items like food.
Hoteliers had escaped unscathed when VAT was increased to 18%.
The government is now reducing this concession to hoteliers which has ultimately been made not at the expense of the government, which doesn’t make money but only collects it, but off the taxpayer. For yes, it is taxpayers and not the government who subsidise the hotel business.
The special subsidy for hotels is not being removed altogether, though to hear the protests you would think it is. The change which this Budget brings is that VAT on hotel accomodation is now 7% instead of 5% – or rather, 7% instead of the 18% it should be if hotels were treated like the rest of Malta’s businesses.
Hoteliers have been gnashing their teeth despite enjoying a record-breaking summer in tourism. And they have been telling us the reduction in their subsidy will amount to €6 million.
What this means, in effect, is that they will still enjoy a subsidy of €33 million which any other sector would have to pay the exchequer. This is just part of the real budget for tourism because these €33 million are only for starters.
The taxpayer is to be made to spend another €35 million on the Malta Tourism Authority in 2011, to market Malta, which translates as ‘to bring in business for private enterprises called hotels’. Which other business in Malta can claim such privileges? The taxpayer will of course also give ‘incentives’, which means subsidies, to low-cost airlines.
But that’s not all. The taxpayer will set up a new €10 million fund subsidising hotels to improve their product. Another €3 million will go to improve tourism workers’ skills. An extra €2 million will upgrade hotels’ energy efficiency. Apart from a new scheme of soft loans for the same purpose.
Another €19 million will see the taxpayer improve tourist areas. Improvement works on access to all Neolithic temples will cost another €14 million in the next few years.
Shall I bore you with the real budget’s expenditure for the Institute of Tourism Studies? Or the roads that benefit tourism? Or the beach concessions to hotels?
Do you want to hear about the €100 million recapitalisation of Air Malta – a euphemism for writing off its losses and subsidising the national airline acceptably in the EU?
Not really. You might have already totted up the eye-watering amounts by which we subsidize our New Dry Docks: €80 million a year directly and upwards of €40 million in projects that benefit mostly tourism, apart from Air Malta’s €100 million ‘recapitalisation’.
Then we get the MHRA telling us that, no, they really don’t like this new ‘tax’ on tourism which works out at €6 per tourist (the amount tourists are charged for a bottle of water in some areas), and that it is a threat to thousands of jobs in the tourist industry blah blah blah.
And, yes, they would be in favour instead of a departure tax on the Maltese taxpayers who subsidise them. Again. That’s gratitude for you – and by that, I mean gratitude to the taxpayer, not the government.
Can we make a suggestion to the Finance Minister? Scrap the MCESD. It’s where unrepresentative unelected posers fleece the taxpayer.
If you keep the MCESD, could you please appoint at least 10 taxpayers’ representatives? You might actually save yourself and Malta from being strangled and suffocated by this New Dry Docks.
53 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
A must-read for the PL Business Forum.
“Scrap the MCESD. It’s where unrepresentative unelected posers fleece the taxpayer.” Brilliant
“Scrap the MCESD”. Of course. I agree. This useless body of talking heads has now outlived its welcome. But it made good vote-catching material when the need arose. Oh I love how the Nationalists are now tearing at their mask like a lion trapped lion in a net trying to break free. Lovely.
Sounds like sour grapes and a dose of envy.
‘Nationalists’ and almost anyone likely to vote Nationalist can think, Albert. We don’t need six years of hindsight to work out things like the result of a referendum.
Of course the Nationalist Party makes a bollocks of some things – and we are bright enough to realise it and honest enough to criticise it when it does so. Far more sensible and honest than applauding everything our great leader says without ever analysing it. Now THAT is really the road to perdition that you’d like to take us down.
Boy. do we need a lot more people who can really think.
In few words: excellent and eye opening post! Thumbs up to the author!
Very well writ indeed.
Subsidies, including preferential VAT, tax and utility rates are odious and should be scrapped altogether.
I could never understand how I was expected to subsidise entrepreneurs in the tourist industry to make it possible for them to drive around the island in cars that cost a quarter of a million euros and to cross over to Sicily in two-million-euro boats.
Let me be clear. I do not envy them and their cars and boats. No sour grapes here.
Actually I admire them for having done so well.
What I find unacceptable is that the state forces me to contribute to their well-being and to their living standards.
Thank you for the post.
I’m sure that there are going to be howls of rage from the various tourist industry lobbies, most of which are multiple lobbies representing the same persons. Even louder howls from blinkered politicians who should know better.
People who, like me, work in export-oriented manufacturing companies would love to have just a tiny portion of all the lolly being given to the tourist sector.
The MCESD is a forum where the government consults with the constituted bodies on economic and social matters. As such, since the government is elected to represent the people, it may seem that the MCESD is an anomaly.
However, there is nothing wrong that government consults with bodies that represent specific interests or sectors. I believe this forum has been instrumental in minimizing serious industrial unrest for many years now.
Therefore, I would not scrap the MCESD at all.
However, the subject of the article is the New Drydocks, which I understand is AirMalta. Unfortunately, the focus of the article on this subject is lost through the article, which seems to deal more with the subsidies to the tourism industry, the MHRA and the MCESD.
The article never deals with the real issues at AirMalta and I am not any wiser about those issues after reading this article. However, I agree with the gist of the article that the tourism industry is benefitting a lot from taxpayer funds and that we need the industry to contribute to our development and pay back our investments.
It is only this way that we can justify all the investments that the government makes, including the “capitalisation” of the losses of AirMalta. Euro 100 million could easily have been used to buy two Airbus A320s.
“However, there is nothing wrong that government consults with bodies that represent specific interests or sectors..”
The problem centres on the word ‘consults’. There is nothing wrong in consultation but the perception one gets of the attitude of the MCESD is that it is ‘ruling’ the country. Jew nilghab jew inhassar.
Maryanne, hardly so.
The MCESD is made up of representatives of groups of people with very different interests to defend. It may not have contributed greatly to better economic policies but it has certainly contributed to better social dialogue.
Just brilliant.
I cringe every time I hear government ministers claiming that they have no intention of privatising Air Malta or even the utilities. The national airline is hugely overstaffed and has gone into loss-making freefall because it cannot pick up the enormous wage bill for its pampered staff.
The same can be said for many government departments and the utilities.
The last UK Labour government also employed hundreds of thousands in its departments, quangos and local councils. It is now left to the Tories to cull these mostly useless jobs costing the nation billions in annual deficit.
Indeed Air Malta is the new Dry Docks, a massive drain on the country’s resources which will be even more difficult to amputate because of its direct relationship with tourism.
It was set up as a monopoly by Mintoff’s Labour and manned by largely unproductive labourites, many of whom are still there today.
And yet our ministers refuse to admit that very drastic measures must be taken. So far we have restructuring (Eur 100 million subsidies) and a couple of years down the line it will be reform (perhaps another Eur 100m).
When the bottom falls out we will be left with millions of euros to pay in redundancy payments. Dry Docks all over again.
Air Malta can never be compared to the Dry Docks. Get your facts right.
The Dry Docks never made a single penny in profit, with the exception of one year in the early eighties. Air Malta was profitable to such an extent that, up to the mid-nineties, it had millions of Liri in reserve.
What has crippled the airline is not the “enormous wage bill for its pampered staff”. It was a series of inane decisions no-one ever bothered to explain, notably the purchasing of the Avro RJ’s, the setting up of AzzuraAir, and the present insistence to have a fleet of Airbuses only.
The bill the company has difficulties in picking up is for the fuel the aircraft burn. May I remind you that had it not been for the surge in the price of oil in the past years, Air Malta would have broken even.
Finally, Air Malta was never allowed to operate purely as a commercial entity. How has it become “hugely overstaffed”? Well, I guess you know the answer. It’s quite rich for a minister, any minister, to complain that Air Malta is overstaffed.
That was exactly my point – Air Malta was never allowed to operate as a commercial entity. The result: the taxpayer pays and through the nose.
As for fuel costs being the bane of Air Malta’s distress, may I point out the several very profitable airline companies with much larger fleets – and much smaller workforce – that operate also from Malta.
Which airlines, exactly? British Airways pulled out last summer; Emirates’ Larnaca-Dubai route is operated under a code-sharing agreement with Air Malta.
Ryanair, for cyring out loud? Does anyone want our legacy carrier to operate in the same way as Ryanair, subsidized with our money, flying to far-flung airports at strange hours and with 20 minute turn-arounds?
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20101028/local/government-announces-vat-concession-to-mhra
In the last four years, an average 1.2 million tourists visited Malta. Whether you see this as a ‘tax’ or actually as a reduction of the subsidy to hoteliers, it is only €5 on each tourist. And the MHRA says it’s a threat to tourism. Please, MHRA.
As you say, it’s not a real threat. The problem is that for all (not most) tourism companies, the price lists and budgets for next year have been fixed already.
The right to change the rates if taxes change are reserved most of the time. But this does not mean that the tour operators will be happy.
Nothing much will happen though – operators will not protest other than to promote countries from which they get more return. Most operators also have brochures printed and distributed to travel agents, and they are now committed as well.
this VAT change is not as easy to solve having come so late in the day, and will most probably end up being absorbed by the hoteliers in malta.
for the benefit of those who don’t know the industry, pricing for 2011 has been fixed/negotiated in April 2010 approximately. that is the way the industry works. there is no such thing as variable pricing unless your business depends totally on B2C. In a B2B world, this is near chaos.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20101028/local/government-announces-vat-concession-to-mhra
From what I know at ITS, the government spends €2 million on administration at ITS and another €1 million on ITS student stipends. Hoteliers are really ungrateful to a government that trains their people at its expense.
What about the new bay at St George’s with a leading hotelier being given part of a public beach for his hotel’s restaurant? And then the same hotelier criticises the government’s measure on TV. What effrontery!
Tonio Fenech qliehom b’żejthom.
Issa we see how many contracts they have already signed and to what value.
A few weeks ago these same people were telling us that the order of the day in tourism now is last-minute booking.
Ħalluna!
“Tonio Fenech qliehom b’żejthom.” Of course, he did. Are we going to trust their estimates?
“It said that copies of the agreements should be sent in confidence to the CEO of the Malta Tourism Authority by Monday. The MTA offices will be open for the purpose on Saturday and Sunday between 9 a.m. and noon. The contracts should be accompanied by an estimate of the number of tourists which are expected to be brought to Malta.” – timesofmalta.com
I had signed a contract with one of the leading hotels for a conference to be organised next year, prior to the budget. One of the conditions was that if the government increases the tax, we have to pay this extra amount.
So you can imagine what I said when I heard the MHRA say that they will have to suffer this loss as the contracts have already been signed.
Can someone please answer this:
What is the VAT rate charged in HOTEL restaurants?
[Daphne – The same as all other restaurants. The VAT concession is on hotel accomodation only.]
This is in fact one of the problems these concessions and subsidies create. If I’m investing in a new business, I’m better served investing in a hotel than a restaurant. There should be a level playing field and hotel accommodation should be at 18% as any other non-essential service.
But that’s only partly correct, Daphne. If a guest buys accommodation (note the double “m” in accommodation) + Full Board supplement, then the FB will be subject to the same VAT rate as the accommodation.
The hotel industry fatcats are in a right mess.
They have already concluded agreements with their tour operators. Moreover some of them have ordered an upgraded version of their superyacht for next summer.
Tonio Fenech cannot go around randomly shooting from the hip at golden geese. At this rate we will end up with no eggs.
Birdlife please take note.
Following from what you said about the superyachts, one possible compromise would be to have a transitory period on the tourism VAT rate but increase immediately the VAT rate on yachts to 50%.
And there is more – Extract from Times on line today::
“Thursday, 28th October 2010 – 14:09CET
Government announces VAT concession to MHRA
The government said today that it is considering a transition period on the imposition of VAT at 7% on tourist accommodation….”
Evidently, it is not economics that count here, but the level of clout that can be wielded by the sector.
Totally agree. The MHRA keep on asking for more and more and government should not give in to their unreasonable requests. Government should never let itself be blackmailed by threats of laying off workers in the tourist industry.
The MHRA also expects an 18-month notice for any increase in tax. They did not get it this time. Perhaps the next step by the finance minister is to inform the MHRA that in 18 months’ time, VAT on accommodation will be increased to 18%.
If you want to delay any real action and avoid taking a decision, create a working group. The MCESD serves that purpose perfectly well. In fact, it has become a circus for ‘certain performers’ with inflated egos. Others with much bigger egos want to join the club as well.
Nothing can be discussed on a confidential basis. They all leak confidential left, tight and centre, and are more interested in putting spokes in the wheels. Most of these organisations report to a higher authority. The MLP is represented by the GWU.
Rather than the agreements with tour operators, the hotels should present their financial statements. There one could analyze the ‘losses’ and expenses. Analyze the breakdown of management fees, etc. Note that most of these hotels obtained their land and beach concessions for free or a ridiculous amount.
MHRA should have been more honest in their criticism. What will ward off tourists? The 2% VAT increase on a EUR 70 accommodation fee (EUR 1.40) or the overcharging, rudeness, abrasiveness, and the lack of quality of certain staff employed by the hotels themselves.
I agree with this article. We are constantly brainwashed into believing that we need to reach the million-plus tourist, while we conveniently forget the costly burden, stress and damage to the island’s infrastructure (especially in summer).
No, we don’t need to boast about reaching astronomical figures in tourism lest the situation starts to resemble that of the drydocks, which – when turnover was reported at record figures – the losses incurred thereafter were more than double the usual amount, resulting in more subsidy from the taxpayer.
These hoteliers are not worried about their employees losing their job but about losing their luxurious way of living. VAT should be at 18% like every other business.
AirMalta should be privatised like the dockyard.
A big ‘prosit’ to whoever wrote this brilliant article as it is an outright defence of the taxpayer.
Hoteliers also pay reduced VAT of 5% for the drinks they serve at their bars for the all inclusive system. This system is killing all the bars surrouding the hotels and should also be abiolished.
Nothing to do with this topic but I couldn’t help noticing who that the magistrate and lawyer in this beastly case are kind of related!
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090219/local/guilty-of-brutal-child-abuse
Another of your ‘excellent’ articles, dear Daphne.
It isn’t MY article, Karl. It’s a guest post, written by somebody else.
Dear Daphne,
Knowing who the author of these guest posts is might give a little bit more credibility to the text.
[Daphne – Why? The author is credible enough, believe me. I have no time for morons, as you know by now.]
I might agree but I find it strange that you made a strong argument against it in the past and now it seems to be ok just because you know who the anonymous person is. Well – we don’t – and I’m not going to waste my time reading something without a name attached to it. As you wrote – rightly – in March, arguments that come with names attached are taken seriously. Those without names attached are not.
http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2010/03/31/no-names-no-credibility-stop-project-piano-a-typically-cunning-plan-by-labours-crack-team-of-public-affairs-wizards/
“The single greatest enemy of credibility is anonymity.
The way it works is simple: if you don’t have the courage of your convictions, then you’re going to convince nobody.
Arguments that come with names attached are taken seriously. Those without names attached are not.
If you stand by what you have to say, then others will stand by you.
If you don’t, they won’t.”
[Daphne – Friends with Malcolm Bonnici, are you? Read my reply to him.]
“The single greatest enemy of credibility is anonymity.
“The way it works is simple: if you don’t have the courage of your convictions, then you’re going to convince nobody.
“Arguments that come with names attached are taken seriously. Those without names attached are not.” – Daphne Caruana Galiza
[Daphne – Ah, but this person is not actually anonymous because I know exactly who he is, and you know exactly who I am. I don’t think there is anyone who would suggest that the entire editorial content of the The Times and The Sunday Times, up to 12 years ago or so, was not credible because the newspaper, as a matter of policy, carried no by-lines. Or have you forgotten ‘By a staff reporter’? And was the famous Page 13 not credible because nobody was sure who actually wrote it? Are the leading articles in newspapers not credible because they often aren’t written by the editor and readers don’t know who wrote them? There is a vast difference between complete anonymity and people hiding behind it, and articles without a by-line which are published by somebody (or an organisation) which is NOT anonymous. This is not an anonymous article. Consider it to be the equivalent of a leading article in a newspaper.]
Excuse me for not observing the first sentence above wherein you stated it was a guest post. I usually ignore the pieces re Kurt, et al. I admit my eyes didn’t miss the ‘hot pants’, though.
Well it’s your argument against your argument. Which one is right? For all its worth, it was amusing watching you arguing against yourself.
By the way I have no idea who Aldrin Borg is. Don’t know him, never met him and never spoke to him.
[Daphne – It’s NOT my argument against my argument. I am really shocked at the way so many Maltese have such a primitive and simplistic understanding of communication, missing completely all the codes and meanings. A leading article (the editorial) in a newspaper is by its nature without a by-line. This does not detract from its credibility, because it is carried as the voice of the newspaper and so has the newspaper’s credibility.
In other words, and to spell it out for you, a leading article without a by-line is a completely different animal to, for example, an anonymous letter published in the same newspaper’s correspondence column, which does not have the newspaper’s stamp of credibility as it is not something commissioned or requested by the newspaper from somebody known to the newspaper. Such commissions or requests are made by all newspapers and they all carry exactly the same weight and credibility as the newspaper itself, which means that, say, articles with no by-line in the Torca or KullHadd have little or no credibility by leading articles without a by-line in The Times or The Malta Independent do.
To explain this still further with direct reference to this website, a guest post which I have requested from somebody I know who knows far more about a certain subject than I do, and can write about it better and more effectively (but who does not wish his name to appear because, as with the leading article in a newspaper, it is unnecessary as the article is being presented as the official view of this website, which it is) is NOT THE SAME as the many and multifarious anonymous comments which are sent in, and which appear under a variety of names. I trust all is now clear.
It is also worth pointing out to you that use of language and idiom, knowledge of the facts, writing style, wit and other indicators of intelligence are signifiers of credibility which non-primitive communicators can pick up easily with or without a name to tell them who wrote it. Really sophisticated communicators actually examine only those other things and ignore the name, and sometimes reach the conclusion that the name at the top of the piece is not the name of the person who wrote it.]
Credible or not the author missed some other very important figures.
1. For every tourist that enters Malta the goverment gets an average of 100Euros per head from taxes. Isn’t that a big contribution?
2. Even though we had a record breaking summer with regards to arrivals the actual profit made by hotels actually decreased when compared to 2006, 2007 and 2008.
3. And you are wrong when saying that the departure tax would effect Maltese. As proposed by MHRA the departure tax should be imposed only tourist and the reasoning behind it is very simple. 1/3 of the tourist that land in Malta do not actually stay in Hotels so really and truly with the MHRA proposal the government can collect more taxes.
4. The MHRA protested strongly because contracts for next year with tour operators where already signed and not for the actual rise in tax.
We’re at the end of October and the hotels have an occupancy over 90%.
Two years ago I worked in a FIVE STAR hotel where hundreds of tourists were taken to nearby Sicily because we were overbooked.
The taxpayer paid to bring tourists to Malta and our hotel brought tourists to get a taste of Maltese ‘hospitality’.
A typical hotel briefing at nine in the morning:
“Let’s send them to the Portomaso apartments.”
“They’re fully occupied.”
“Any hotels in Malta?”
“All full, sir, some are overbooked, because the conferences they were holding are all confirmed.”
” So let’s try San Lawrenz Hotel in Gozo.”
” Gozo’s hotels are full and we had some complaints.”
“So let’s send them for a few days to Sicily with the catamaran.”
A few days later:
” Sir, we have some guests who would like to continue their holiday in Sicily.”
And who are we employing in our hotels? I can tell you that half of them are untrained foreigners who hardly know how to compose a sentence in English.
Where are the ITS students going?
I’ve seen half-drunk Austrian and Hungarian students serving breakfast, Russian chamber maids pushing their trolleys right behind the guests in a narrow corridor, African ‘kitchen helpers’ handling rubbish and unloading vegetables a while later without washing their hands in between.
Many Maltese hoteliers employ cheap labour and treat their employers badly. An industry cannot do well with unhappy mistreated employees.Valid people are scared of working with these employers and seek greener pastures.
Mela, though I agree with the piece, it is by no means comprehensive and I think it suffers because the context is missing.
Why not mention that 60% of revenue comes from income tax, NI and VAT – in other words, people who work and earn a little more than the minimum wage?
Why not mention that consultant doctors, mechanics, plumbers, several shopkeepers and of course, lawyers (etc etc) almost never give you a VAT receipt, thereby forcing wage-earners to fork out more? Is it just hoteliers that look after no.1? Yeah – right, and I’m a virgin too!
[url=http://smyczeplusgadzety.pl]gadżety reklamowe[/url]
Bet At Home
[url=http://www.bukmacher24.org]Expekt bonus[/url]
[url=http://www.bukmacher24.org/bukmacher-bwin.php]Bwin[/url]
[url=http://www.bukmacher24.org/bukmacher-sportingbet.php]Sportingbet[/url]
zaklady bukmacherskie STS
miley cyrus sexy miley cyrus nude miley cyrus nipple slip miley cyrus mom miley cyrus boobs
Whose bright idea for wanting you to hurt. It. Huge member dangled like a.
LOLITA CP NUDE LOLITA
[URL=http://18young-lady-fuck-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb78666ea3.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://18lolita-tiny-pussy-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7a60a5f2.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://young-babe-18hardcore-rar.89.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7cecd336.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://18young-lady-fuck-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7698b894.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://18lolita-tiny-pussy-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7a186a38.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://young-babe-18hardcore-rar.89.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7b8d67ea.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://18young-lady-fuck-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb78413e86.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://18lolita-tiny-pussy-rar.osc.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb79961c9c.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://young-babe-18hardcore-rar.89.pl][IMG]http://img12.imageshost.ru/img/2011/05/24/image_4ddbb7c00d8c2.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
little One of the biggest torrents indexer with more then 1500000 torrents listed. little brandy in cute little teenie underwear shows her cute tits.wmv
Create Photo Montages and Frames, be with a star Face in Hole Generators, Caption Text Generators, Photo Effects for MySpace, Facebook, and Orkut Scraps, Montagens de fotos para orkut My Little Pony Photo Frame Text Generator
Dog Names | Dog Girl Names – Search Dog Names Alphabet | Find Dog Names – Page: 10 NA-Dog Names – lexy. Origin: NA. Name Meaning: N/A. Add To Favorites. Old German-Dog Names – Leyna. Origin: Old German. Name Meaning: little angel. Add To Favorites. NA-Dog Names – Leyza. Origin: NA
View Video. Kristen Cavallari, Tara Reid, and more fit pictures xxx. Kristen Cavallari, Tara Reid, Paris Hilton, Rihanna, Caprice Bouret, Katie Price, Jessica Alba, A little something i put together. Sorry about the credits, the last song should be Push, Push(lady Lightning) by Bang Camaro not
litlle preeten xxx 14 y o lolitas australian preteen models. lol zaipal pics lolitta bbs www top lolita net little girl preteen angels net little girl likttle lolitas xxx
young models portal
young nn models
young tiny little small
young glamour models
free young teen tube sex
young nudist
young porn
young teens having sex
young pre teen pussy
very young pre teen girl rape incest sex pics
young tiny pussy
young wet pussy
young free porn
young little tubes
young models for fun
old man young girl porn
tiny young girlies vids free
young chinese models
lolita top 100
young japanese models
little child models
young pussy fucking
young lolli models
young girl models
the young ones
young naked pussy
photography top50 young
very very young nn model galleries
young hairless
tiny young
tiny young teenie blowjob tubes
little lolita
young girl sex
young nn models
young models portal
young black porn
tiny young models
little models top sites
pre teen lolitas
free young porn movies
lolita model
young tiny pussy
young sex tube
little red riding hood
young anal sex
young black pussy
young tiny little models
young girl porn
sex stories about young tiny girls
young couple having sex
extreme young porn
young girls sex
hot young models
free young teen porn tube sex
tight young teen hairless pussy
little angel models
tiny lolita sex
sweet young pussy
young porn movies
young porn
young beautiful pussy
young dog sex
young teen sex tube
lolitas toplist
young teen sex movies
young tight teen pussy
young models gallery top
young porn clips
free movies of young girl men having sex
free young teenage porn videos
young tiny virgin porn
tiny little young bald
young virgin pussy
young teen models
young lolitas
very young girl porn
very young models
free young porn tubes
young pussy videos
young and old sex
young nn models galleries free
little amour angels
young natural atk
young boy sex stories
little summer and kimmie
tiny young black
free young model forum tiny cp
young porn video
young animal sex tubes
little lola
young porn free
lolita erotic stories
pre teen lolita porn
lolitas young girl sex pics
sexy young models
teen porn very young girls free pictures
young teen sex stories
little tykes
young boys
young pussy tube
[img]http://www.mypagerank.net/services/seostats/seostats.php?s=db471f46a6eb679c0393fbd5582b5a&bg=FFFFFF&textcolor=FFFFFF&bordercolor=FFFFFF&indicatorcolor=FFFFFF&ugo=1&uho=1&umo=1&amo=1&upr=1&tuv=1&tpv=1&yuv=1&ypv=1&ttuv=1&ttpv=1&uonline=1&f=517149[/img]
codeine compared to darvocet