There's nothing like a British Conservative prime minister for leadership in a crisis
“We have seen the uprising of a people against a brutal dictator, and it will send a dreadful signal if their legitimate aspirations are crushed, not least to others striving for democracy across the region. To those who say it is nothing to do with us, I would simply respond: Do we want a situation where a failed pariah state festers on Europe’s southern border, potentially threatening our security, pushing people across the Mediterranean and creating a more dangerous and uncertain world for Britain and for all our allies as well as for the people of Libya? My answer is clear: this is not in Britain’s interests. And that is why Britain will remain at the forefront of Europe in leading the response to this crisis.”
————
David Cameron is the only one who can see the wood for the trees and is not afraid to say so.
THIS IS HIS FULL STATEMENT TO THE HOUSE, DELIVERED YESTERDAY
Mr Speaker, let me turn to the substance of Friday’s special European Council. The reason for having this Council was two-fold:
First, to make sure Europe seizes this moment of opportunity to support the Arab people in North Africa and across the Middle East in realising their aspirations for a more open and democratic form of government. And second to address the difficult situation in Libya.
The Council addressed both these issues and I will be frank with the House about where progress has been made and what more needs to be done.
First, supporting the building blocks of democracy in the Arab world. Mr Speaker, the aim should be a big bold comprehensive offer to those countries in our southern neighbourhood that want to move towards becoming open societies. There was some real success. The Council Declaration talks of a “new partnership” founded on “broader market access and political co-operation” and with an approach that gears support to those countries where progress is being made in meeting their citizens aspirations.
This could be so much better than the failed approach of the past. But now Europe needs to follow through on its declaration with a real and credible offer to these countries based on three of the key freedoms – movement of goods, services and investment.
Turning to Libya, Mr Speaker, it was right for the EU to meet and discuss how we can work together to deal with this crisis. There has been considerable international co-operation on evacuation. We’ve now got over 600 British nationals out and assisted over 30 other nationalities. Around 220 British nationals remain in Libya, the overwhelming majority of whom are long-term residents and many are, of course, dual nationals or spouses of Libyan nationals. Many of this group have told us they wish to remain in Libya. But a number of other British nationals are now contacting us for the first time. We will stay in contact with these people and continue to assist those who wish to leave.
On further isolating the Gaddafi regime, the Council made good progress. Mr Speaker, two weeks ago we put in place a tough UN Security Council resolution and agreed in record time asset freezes, travel bans and an arms embargo, as well as referral to the International Criminal Court. At this Council, all European leaders were united, categorical and crystal clear that Gaddafi must “relinquish power immediately.”
We widened the restrictive measures against individuals close to Gaddafi. And strengthened the financial sanctions on the regime, adding the Libyan Central Bank and the Libyan Investment Authority to the EU asset-freezing list. In doing so the UK has increased the total of frozen Libyan assets in this country from £2 billion to £12 billion.
We now need to make clear the next measures in terms of putting further pressure on the regime and planning for what other steps may be necessary.
Two weeks ago I told this House I believed contingency planning should be done, including plans for a military no fly zone. NATO is carrying out that work. And in recent days first, the Gulf Co-operation Council, and now the Arab League, have called for a no fly zone. In terms of the European Council, of course, the EU is not a military alliance. And there is always a hesitation discussing military options.
But the Council expressed its “deep concern about attacks against civilians, including from the air”, and agreed that Member States will “examine all necessary options” for protecting the civilian population, provided there is a demonstrable need, a clear legal basis and support from the region.
That was some progress, especially compared with where Europe was in advance of Friday’s Council. But we need to continue to win the argument for a strong response in the international community – Europe included.
Along with others in the United Nations Security Council, the UK is following up urgently the lead given by the Arab League by drafting a Resolution which sets out the next measures that need to be taken, including the option of a no-fly zone. Included in the Resolution in our view should be much tougher measures against mercenaries and the states from which they come, as well as others who are attempting to breach the sanctions and assist Gaddafi.
Every day Gaddafi is brutalising his own people. Time is of the essence. There should be no let-up in the pressure we put on this regime.
Mr Speaker, I am clear where British national interest lies. It is in our interests to see the growth of open societies and the building blocks of democracy in North Africa and the Middle East. And when it comes to Libya we should be clear about what is happening.
We have seen the uprising of a people against a brutal dictator, and it will send a dreadful signal if their legitimate aspirations are crushed, not least to others striving for democracy across the region. To those who say it is nothing to do with us, I would simply respond: Do we want a situation where a failed pariah state festers on Europe’s southern border, potentially threatening our security, pushing people across the Mediterranean and creating a more dangerous and uncertain world for Britain and for all our allies as well as for the people of Libya?
My answer is clear: this is not in Britain’s interests. And that is why Britain will remain at the forefront of Europe in leading the response to this crisis.
15 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
I am proud to believe in a Conservative ideology.
The Libyan crisis could give Cameron an opportunity to climb to the level of Thatcher and Churchill. Libya, like banking and finance, is another department where British Labour failed badly.
Cameron is a Globalist and a warmonger. Britains nose has been bloodied enough. If this fool gets Britain involved here then he can expect to be deposed himself as The British are fed up with their warmongering politicians already.
Oh, really? And can you speak on behalf of the British?
“Do we want a situation where a failed pariah state festers on Europe’s southern border, potentially threatening our security, pushing people across the Mediterranean and creating a more dangerous and uncertain world for Britain and for all our allies as well as for the people of Libya?”
My answer is clear too: this is not in Malta’s interests. Malta must do something serious about this. At least, we can support the British government on this position. This is our nextdoor neighbour Cameron is talking about here.
Yes he is very good in making speeches. Now what?
I never, for one single moment, ever doubted the competence of this man.
He certainly deserved his first in PPE from Oxford.
We have heard him, many a time, speak without notes which, in itself, is no mean feat. This is something which Churchill rarely did. He sometimes stayed up all night polishing his “impromptu speeches” as he put it.
Cameron has lots of Winnie in him in that he can appeal to and communicate well with the archetypal and quintessential Englishman.
What he does not share with his predecessor is that man’s unique and incomparable mastery of the great English language.
David Cameron certainly has the potential to become a great prime minister in true Conservative tradition.
Pfft! In Frankie Boyle’s words, he looks like he should be playing the f**king trombone in a f**king brass band.
The only politician who could ever have become a great prime minister was Robin Cook. But he’s pushing up the daisies now.
Robin Cook was a brilliant man. He was also an alcoholic and a seasoned philanderer.
Consequently he never stood much chance of achieving greatness.
Baxxter, you are smart, but with too much of a negative attitude.
I beg to differ Daphne…
A very compelling statement but…
There are two kinds of sins – those of commission and those of omission.
The sin of commission lies on Gaddafi’s doorstep while the sins of omission lie squarely on various doorsteps including those of the UN, EU and NATO.
Cameron’s statement is fine but is far short of any action which leads to the demise of the Gaddafi regime. So, however good his speech is, he is still party to those guilty of the sin of omission.
Comes a time when time simply runs out and as far as the Libyan protesters are concerned that threshold is aproaching within hours, not days or weeks. Weeks ago was the time to take a bold action and not engage in a series of talks, meetings and procrastinations. The blood of the slaughtered martyrs seeking basic freedoms we take so much for granted falls on those who falsely waited for things to sort themselves out among the two factions which divide Libya.
Unfortunately if nothing is done in a matter of hours, there will only be one faction left – that one headed by Gaddafi and even if in the end (and too late) Gaddafi goes, his allies will still be an embittered nation with a worse attitude towards the West than Gaddafi’s.
China’s attitude will not change because it is just as guilty of atrocities against humanity as Gaddafi, and probably much worse, so siding with the rest of the UN regarding the no-fly zone, automatically implies guilt for their past actions.
China today will only respond to restricting Chinese imports but that takes time to put in place, much too late for those fighting with clubs, stones and hunting rifles against a fully armed army equipped with the latest weaponry.
Hasn’t BP signed some oil deals with Gaddafi? So the UK stopped grovelling for oil? At least Cameron is putting on a brave face and giving this a nice spin…
I certainly don’t want a pariah state festering down there. Say bye-bye to cruise liners in the Med for as long as Gaddafi stays in power antagonising Europe. This certainly needs to be resolved in terms of months. I hope the rebels are a viable alternative.
This is how a British Labour prime minister behaved. Read this piece published seven years ago:
http://news.scotsman.com/lockerbie/With-friends-like-these.2515495.jp
Good point but wrong title. Being ‘conservative’ has bugger all to do with resolve and principles. John Major was hopeless when Serbia was waging genocide in Bosnia. It took Tony Blair to stand up to Milosevic in Kosovo and Bosnia. Cameron has said the right things but talk at the moment is the only thing the UK can afford
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110316/opinion/the-moment-of-truth-has-come