Unbelievable Saviour
I don’t know why he’s worried. After all, he’s got a BRILLIANT lawyer: the deputy leader of the Labour Party. Not the Tuks Master, but the other one.
Saviour says below that in the past his newspaper was hit by many libel suits from Labour politicians, “because at that time we used to criticise the Labour Party” (note the body language at this point).
But now, he says, he is sued by Nationalist politicians because he criticises the government.
He doesn’t mention that his libel lawyer nowadays is the Labour Party’s deputy leader. So exactly what would happen if, in the unlikely even that he were to lie horribly about a Labour politician, that politician were to sue?
That’s one hell of an independent newspaper you’ve got there, Saviour, with Labour’s deputy leader retained or on fees as its libel lawyer.
Has he introduced you to any nice rubber puppets lately? No, not even ones with big lips and eye-popping bosoms? Shame.
5 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment

Why does Saviour mention 2004 as the year since which he has not had libel suits from Labour? What happened in 2004?
Why didn’t MT criticise Labour from 2004?
Daphne, why do you waste your time on this piece of s*it? Let him waste his own time.
Balzan should accept the fact that he IS a PL pawn; it seems he is thrilled by this idea.
He is going round in circles at this point. Nithassru.
Last weekend I expected to find a special edition of ILLUM to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the killing of Raymond Caruana.