The bits he doesn’t tell you on Facebook

Published: April 30, 2012 at 1:04pm

So here’s the Botox Jeff divorce update, given that he’s too busy telling you on Facebook the stuff that you don’t give a fig about, like his supper, choice of music and favourite tea (qisu tifla ta’ hmistax-il sena).

Botox Jeff and Marlene ta’ Godfrey u tal-festi were divorced, at which point Marlene reverted to her maiden name of Farrugia and the assumption was made that she had married her boyfriend, also called Farrugia, but apparently they haven’t yet. They just have the same surname.

Botox Jeff’s girlfriend Carmen Camilleri has also divorced her husband and is now known as Carmen Ciantar.

It looks like we’re going to start a whole new worldwide fashion for divorcees, in which it is obligatory to go back to being Miss X instead of staying Mrs Y, which is the norm with divorce. You know, qisu annullament.

And as reported in an earlier post, Botox Jeff and the newly Miss Ciantar are going to be married in August, not at Monte Kristo vineyards, I trust, like all the other Labour weddings and festivities of the last three years or so.

Of course I wouldn’t have bothered with any of this and neither would you, but that puny jerk has made damned sure his marriage, his need for divorce and his demands to marry his girlfriend so that he can take her to papal masses on the Floriana granaries became matters of national interest.

The upside is that we got our divorce legislation out of his personal problems.

It’s a bit hard to demand his privacy now. At this rate, he should be inviting us all to the feast, or at least broadcasting the cermeony live on Facebook. But he has a class act to follow by somebody who got there first: John Attard Montalto’s wedding to his girlfriend was broadcast live on the internet from the cruise ship on which it took place.




11 Comments Comment

  1. ciccio says:

    “But he has a class act to follow by somebody who got there first: John Attard Montalto’s wedding to his girlfriend was broadcast live on the internet from the cruise ship on which it took place.”

    Considering his position with the MCST and Malta’s participation in the space program, he should consider getting married on the International Space Station, with live broadcast on CNN and Al Jazeera.

    Joseph Muscat will procure free travel for the couple on board one of North Korea’s new breed of missile-satellites, with the name of Pimpmyride001, in one of those flights which are “a legitimate right of sovereign states.”

    Joseph Muscat has a guarantee from Kim Jong Un that there will be no nuclear armaments on board.

    • Never can tell, Ciccio. Maybe Jeffy will be carrying more than botox in his panties. I’m sure his ‘betrothed’ is anticipating at least a small explosion.

    • Angus Black says:

      But what if the rocket meant to bring them back suffers a N Korean setback and never reaches the space station?

      One big problem inadvertently solves another?

      • Joe says:

        ‘But what if the rocket meant to bring them back suffers a N Korean setback and never reaches the space station?’

        How is that a problem, pray?

  2. John Schembri says:

    Malta Today on line survey:

    As things currently stand, do you find Franco Debono to be credible?

    No: he is threatening government stability for being left out of the Cabinet. 25%

    Yes: he is campaigning on much-needed legal and judicial reforms. 26%

    No: unless he votes against the Budget measures bill of 9 May. 39%

    I don’t care about Franco Debono. 10%

    26% of voters think that Franco is credible, 65% think otherwise.

  3. edgar says:

    The other question was. Do you find Malta Today credible. Yes 100%.

    • Observer says:

      In other words Malta Today are daring Franco to vote against his government , so that the 39% would add up to the 26% and ’the people’ would be represented.

      Bizzilla jew tghaffiga?

      Kemm hsibtuna boloh, Salv.

  4. Jacky says:

    “not at Monte Kristo vineyards, I trust, like all the other Labour weddings and festivities of the last three years or so.”
    Where do you expect Labour weddings to take place in the President’s Palace? It is only the PN who can hold their weddings receptions and other private functions in Government buildings. I wonder who paid for these weddings; was it the spouses or the Maltese nation?

    [Daphne – Labour weddings do currently take place at the presidential palace, Jacky. Or hadn’t you noticed. Have half a brain, vote Labour.]

  5. Chris Ripard says:

    If a former wife tries desperately to get an annullment and fails, then has to take the second-best option – divorce – should she still maintain the right to use her first husband’s name, a name she claims had nothing to do with her?

    [Daphne – Yes, of course. If you were married, you were married, end of story. But surely if a former wife were so desperate to have the marriage annulled, then she wouldn’t want her husband’s surname. Maybe she only tried to get the marriage annulled because there was no divorce, and actually only wanted to end the marriage and not have it declared as never having existed. Anyway, a married woman is technically Mrs John Borg, while a divorced woman is Mrs Mary Borg. Anyway, I find it strange that women with children would want to reject their husband’s surname, because in so doing they are making a statement about their relationship to their children, too, but they don’t seem to understand this.]

  6. kev says:

    “…but that puny jerk has made damned sure his marriage, his need for divorce and his demands to marry his girlfriend so that he can take her to papal masses on the Floriana granaries became matters of national interest.”

    Tal-ghageb! Talk of squaring a triangle to make a circle.

    No matter how many words you twist and turn, JPO will still be the man who pulled it off. Surely even you can see that as it sits right in the centre of your tiny box.

Leave a Comment