Top comment – “Jeffrey’s fragmenting ego”

Posted by Edward Clemmer:

Well, it seems that JPOS has finally upstaged all of Franco Debono’s recent uncritically-examined child’s play, with JPOS now regaining the attention (because he is and has been a societal menance) he craves.

Unfortunately, after his public rejection and what should be humiliation, JPOS seems to have crossed over the thin white line, and he now wants a vote from the PN to confirm everyone, but himself (and his accomplices), as “insane”.

Of course, in politics, sometimes even those who should be dangerous inmates of the asylum may take over, but not if a sufficient number of people see reason, and not if the rules of rational governance are not subverted.

In this case, however, we seem to have a subversion of rational and analytically sound democratic process by a totalitarian elite, namely of one JPOS (with fragmenting ego), supported by a future spouse and by the populism of the Opposition and its leadership objectives–at any cost.

I wonder if Minister Dr. Joseph Cassar (the psychiatrist) is being consulted in his professional capacity.

In 20/20 hindsight, JPOS should have been given the firm boot during the 2008 election campaign. Unfortunately, his lies were not understood as such by nearly everyone until after Jeffrey’s massive sympathy vote, and by then it was too late.

But his lies were strongly suspected immediately with the 2008 election results, as JPOS was placed on the backbench. JPOS apparently is still a chronic liar.

Now the chickens have come home to roost, but one’s flown over the cuckoo’s nest. The good news is that all of this could have exploded at anytime after the 2008 election, which the PM managed to avoid.

The bad news is that management of the explosion was not delayed further (till 2013): it was initiated by Jeffrey’s private-member’s “Divorce Bill” and then the ante was raised by its incitement and unleashing of Franco Debono’s ego.

Ultimately, the PL exploited these personalities and the government’s one-seat majority, with the PL’s political ends justifying their amoral or immoral means.