Ah, good. I’m tired of being asked about this.
The Times, Thursday, February 28, 2013, 17:52
PN denies rumours about Muscat story
The Nationalist Party has categorically denied rumours on Facebook that it was planning to come out with a story on Joseph Muscat’s personal life in the last week of the election campaign.
In a statement this evening the PN said it disassociated itself from this claim and it did not consider this to be the way to do politics.
Stqarrija PN, il-Hamis, 28 ta’ Frar, 2013
Il-Partit Nazzjonalista jirreferi ghal stejjer ivvintati li qed jidhru fuq facebook u li jghidu, “ We are hearing rumours around the water dispenser that PN are planning to come out with a story on Joseph’s Muscat Personal Life in the last week of the election campaign”.
Il-Partit Nazzjonalista jichad bil-qawwa kollha din l-allegazzjoni u jiddisassocja ruhu bl-aktar mod katergoriku.
Il-Partit Nazzjonalista ma jqisx li dan hu l-mod kif taghmel il-politika.
Ufficcju Informazzjoni, PN
24 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
Who is the other guy?
You mean this week isn’t the last one right?
I suppose the obvious question is: who is the Other Man?
I bet you that if the tables were turned, Labour wouldn’t have hesistated to destroy a man’s life if it was in its way of the “throne” of power.
This shows that Gonzi is really an admirable man.
Does Jason have a brother? The resemblance is uncanny.
Why the pictures Daffers?
[Daphne – I find it interesting to know that they were taken when he was already Opposition leader. I don’t think it appropriate, somehow. Also, I’m curious to know who the other creep is.]
And what exactly was the occasion, if I may ask?
[Daphne – I wasn’t there. You had better ask someone who was.]
The ‘other creep’ must be your brother Daph hon !!!
[Daphne – I’m afraid I don’t have one. And only social-climbing chavs and other assorted hamalli call other women ‘hon’.]
The ‘other creep’ because the first creep’s Muscat.
Does this mean they have this story but will not publish it? Or does it mean that there is no such story? We have a right to know.
Who’s the guy hugging Joseph?
I think that Gonzi reassured Joseph Muscat about this at The Times debate during the break. They were photographed talking.
http://c257.r57.cf3.rackcdn.com/eb202f09e10bf960c6d062d05c950ba32714467598-1338105774-4fc1dfae-620×348.jpg
Who’s the guy posing with Muscat?
[Daphne – I haven’t a clue.]
I’m trying to figure out why you posted 2 photos of the guy alone. It’s as if you are trying to ridicule the man. So what if he went to a private party, and took some photos with his friend, who happened to be Joseph Muscat… Does that make it alright to call him a creep?
[Daphne – Yes. ]
Why is this ”creep” even mentioned when this post is about Joseph Muscat? And can’t Joseph Muscat attend a private party in his personal life?
[Daphne – I trust you understand that leaders of the Opposition and prime ministers are not ordinary people, and as Silvio Berlusconi discovered, no, they are not free to attend a private party in their personal life without considering certain things. What are you going to suggest next – that if Muscat or Gonzi get blind drunk at a private party and end up under the table, nobody should discuss it or report it?]
Looks like a boogie night…
Scraping the pits …
We have photographic evidence. Nothing to categorically deny here.
Were the rumours being mongered round the water or the ice dispenser?
About Joseph in the first pic. That chest hair.. popping out.. It could be implants.. That exuberant smile gives him away though. So he likes being with the lads but at least he’s not drinking here.
I do not get it. So what, Dr. Muscat is at a private party with friends. This doesn’t say much about the man. Pictures could be interpreted in many ways by different people and I believe that insinuating is inappropriate at this point. Besides, you could have well contextualized the photo yourself, which in my opinion is an unfair thing to do. Be more explicit, a photo could be interpreted in a number of ways, even wrongly i.e. unfairly. If there is anything that the public ought to know, please specify clearly what it is. If there isn’t, I think that it is wrong to insinuate about people in this way. Before you say anything else, may I point out that I am far cry from being a PL supporter, I am only expressing my objections for decency’s sake. Thank you and good day.
Is my comment still awaiting moderation……..kindly explain why…or are you out of answers????????
What’s the big deal? He is after all in his thirties, an not under house arrest! And it is a known fact that he is stopped and photographed at every turn with all kinds of people.