What an excellent column this is
Published:
February 11, 2014 at 11:48pm
Ivan Fenech is most definitely the best columnist the Times of Malta has had in living memory. And that is a professional opinion. Reading him is cathartic after ploughing through the wall-to-wall irrationality, twisted thinking, uninformed views, insular obsessions, arguments like chewing-gum, beating about the bush, intellectual dishonesty, refusing to get to the point in case that point comes back and bites them in the rear, and poor writing that clutter up so much newspaper space under most columnists’ names.
It’s worth paying the online subscription just to read him on Tuesdays.
16 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140211/opinion/Suitcase-in-another-hall.506298#.Uvqm4bCPIdV
OMG. Ivan Fenech told Frankie Tabone that his party financing bill is as irrelevant and outdated as his university thesis.
I so agree with you, Daphne.
Totally agree. I just wondered how it took you so long to have him deserve a mention.
Last week’s column was his best yet.
Absolutely. I make it a point of reading his column.
Ah now I understand why we need such a large comity to cut the red tape.
Definitely back to the 80s. The only difference is that Labour has now graduated from brute force to slightly more subtle Internet bullying and from electoral district to financial gerrymandering.
And pulls no punches even about dissertations past their best-by date.
Since I don’t have access to Times Premium I could only read the first few lines of this article. But I didn’t like the word mute when he meant moot.
Why not? It doesn’t cost very much.
Why not?
Prior to the elections, The Times hyped up trivialities to make Gonzi’s government look bad.
More recently, it was an accomplice in Muscat’s bad and costly decision to push out Arriva. It downplayed the implications of the sale of passports and the way it was grossly mismanaged by government.
It downplayed the vote in the European Parliament and the massive negative international publicity Malta got because of PL governments’ shortsightedness. Had it been a PN government which amended a law three times AFTER it was debated and voted upon in Parliament, The Times would have made mincemeat of it.
Muscat still has not explained what was in this agreement: http://www.scribd.com/doc/128130324/Joseph-Muscat-says-he-signed-an-agreement-with-China-on-Malta-s-behalf-it-Torca-18APR2010
Indeed. My kind of writing.
Just a tiny error in the text though: it’s a “moot” point, not mute.
He’s right. I would go one step further though. It is not clear to me that the PN and the non-Labour population are fully aware of what they are dealing with in the Labour Party.
The P.N. is a political party operating in what it thinks, quite wrongly, is a mature western democracy. As its principal aim, it has a vague mission to improve the country’s lot, but like all political parties it is flawed to the same extent its leadership and upper echelons are flawed. Its intentions are good, but the quality of its outcomes may wax and wane according to the skills and good or bad intentions or beliefs of the common mortals upon whom it depends for success. History will show that these outcomes have been mainly positive successes.
Labour, on the other hand, is not a political party. It is a criminal organisation; it operates like one, and has been so since the ascent of Mintoff and his criminally libellous coup d’état against and disposal of Paul Boffa.
That the intimidation is (so far) no longer physically violent but only mediatically so is simply an update for the times.
The Labour Party’s vote buying – not Anglu Farrugia’s pathetic claims of the PN purchasing junkie votes, but the wholesale purchase of every lobby with illegitimate aspirations – is further testament to this criminal behaviour.
Its principal aim is the advancement of its leadership and a restricted set of hangers-on. Malta Taghhom Biss. The country’s advancement is only incidental to these aims at best, and is often times contra-posed to them.
The Labour ‘movement’ corrupts all that it touches, including those who join it with the best intentions, and the corrupt and the amoral flock to it as they know they will find a home there. One need only look at the prominent (and flawed) former members of the P.N. who are now operating within Labour to see how true this is.
The result of this is inevitably economic failure, because the amoral and corrupt tend to be blinded by their greed. If they were not terribly bright to begin with, just cunning, they can and will destroy an economy in short order. That is when they will become seriously undemocratic, the inevitable fate of every Labour government post-Boffa. (Sant’s excluded, mostly).
So a run of successive Labour governments is unavoidably a descent into economic failure and deterioration of freedoms, followed by a struggle for the return to full democracy with further compounding of the economic issues.
Eddie Fenech Adami’s only big mistake was national reconciliation, although one might say it was simply an attempt on putting a brave face on an unwinnable situation: an armed and violent Labour Opposition in the early post-1987 period, with a corrupt and unwilling police force still firmly in Labour’s grip.
But even if it was really a genuine attempt at reconciliation, it’s useless. National reconciliation is ultimately meaningless. There is still a poisonous streak running through Maltese politics because of this. There needs to be atonement, not reconciliation. It is too late for those responsible for the last excesses, but it has to be made clear to the current lot that it will not be tolerated again.
This time round, there has to be jail time. (Henley & Partners are also prime candidates for this). Then there can finally be national reconciliation. But really, on principle there should be no reconciliation with the Mafia.
We need more columnists like Ivan Fenech.