18 months ago he was hanging out on Google, with Il-Guy’s daughter-in-law begging you for questions. Now he doesn’t want to face the press.
Published:
March 30, 2014 at 5:50pm
13 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
Chicken out.
“He can ran, but he cannot hide.”
He can run, but he cannot hide
As a matter of fact he cannot run.
He can waddle, but he cannot hide.
This is not the moment to discuss Karmenu Vella’s nomination as EU Commissioner. The issue now is Muscat’s new Cabinet.
Muscat will have to come out for the ‘Oops we’re not renewing the lease’ day celebrations.
Wow she looks like a battery-operated Madame Tussaud’s wax figurine.
Please, can we call another election? Seriously, this is a joke.
Ok, fine, you got your revenge. Gonzi isn’t going to be PM anymore – not that he deserved to be kicked out, but anyway.
Enough is enough, bring back the professionals who actually understand democracy and not those who like to give value to the rotten attitudes that exist in Malta.
He wasn’t begging ME for questions. He was looking for agreeable people to ask him pre-prepared questions.
People who wanted to participate had to apply, be scrutinised and selected.
It was nothing but a sham.
Lawrence Gonzi’s similar initiative was live and open to anyone who wanted to ask questions spontaneously if I remember correctly.
And yet, a majority decided that it was time for change. And so be it.
The empty desk in the image is very apt. He is always missing when it comes to do his job.
Our Prime Minister, Jo, said in a recent interview: “I don’t mimic anyone”. His real problem is that he mimics everyone he thinks useful.
From Obama to Fenech Adami, to Mintoff, to Cameron, Mussolini, Thatcher…you name it. He is just playing a game, a game which we definitely don’t want to play. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFRedzh0iog#t=60
If I remember correctly, Toni Pellegrini, when he was the head of Xandir Malta, also known as Dardir Malta, created the same gimmick, inviting listeners to put questions to him, live but by telephone, on any subject under the sun, and he would enlighten the questioner and listeners.
It soon became clear that the questions were planted to give Pellegrini the opportunity to expand on a topic of his choice, like the fairness of the perverse electoral result in 1981. The programme did not last long.