There’s no understanding the women who partner up with repulsive men like this
Published:
February 2, 2015 at 4:01pm
“My boyfriend has a penchant for sex parties.”
“Oh lovely, darling. Mine prefers golf.”
15 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20150202/world/sex-offence-trial-of-ex-imf-head-strauss-kahn-opens.554492
Leaders should lead by example.
Good leaders …
Everyone has a price it seems.
most women do.
[Daphne – Only women who don’t have their own money, Mr Loporto. That applied in your time too.]
Whereas the bulk of us men are willing to beg, Mr. Loporto? What a seedy, smutty little man you come across as.
Or a vice.
His second wife, Anne Sinclair, comes from a very rich a background and is a brilliant journalist . She definitely did not marry him for wealth or fame. The problem lies in the fact that it is not easy to spot a manipulator that happens to also be a very intelligent and capable man. DSK is hardly Sandro the Revolutionary or Bozo Muscat.
Sometimes the vice is kept hidden or borderline until the scammer has left enough of a hook so as to be quasi inextractible.
The hook is his heritage, both ways: in, and later out, with the meat attached.
Sometimes the psychopath comes dressed as the psychoanalyst.
Other professionals in business of exposing psychopaths are only interested in pursuing their own agenda. Putting down a bad one is not lucrative: owning a global brand that describes it is.
Sometimes it can take years.
Sometimes it doesn’t but no one cares to destroy the great image built around the public person. Opportunity cost.
Everyone sees what they can gain out of the situation. Or what the so called nation can.
Backs in need of being scratched.
When the balance tips, the manipulator adjusts the opportunity cost difference to scale.
There are always takers.
The losers in the game, those late to the awareness or where exposure has been dosed, rarely speak up: Manipulators target reputation and intangibles which are worth more than plain cash at that level.
Where cash is relatively equal, it is social standing, connections and perceived power that are the name of the game.
Gold diggers are not after a relationship except with money and what money can buy.
I wonder how clever his wife feels now after sticking up for him in the chambermaid’s case but that might depend on her relationship with her bank account.
It takes time to absorb the Jekyll and Hyde nature of people particularly adept at concealing it.
When you are brought up ignorant of this very real side to people, because in your family or in your world it just does not exist, the first person you question is yourself.
If a situation doesn’t tally, you first ask: have I read this wrong? Is my reaction off? Am I too rigid in my perspective? Is this my imagination?
When others give you discreet warnings, scared to offend and more fearful of the backlash, you tend to think: people can’t be that bad, and surely not one “so educated.”
This is what the expert liar and manipulator is counting on/ This is his area of expertise: instilling doubt if gaps start to occur in an otherwise seamless and typically meteoric career: riding that scammer’s wave of deceit and illusion.
Instilling dominance. Not always the classic type.
A reason is given, an explanation, a lie, an excuse.
An excellent liar rarely gets the facts he states wrong. It is the ones he doesn’t state that are the problem. The decoration of the fact, the person reported to have given it, the underlying reason for the action, the details omitted.
For a liar’s behavioural pattern to build up, when the manipulator is a genius at producing alternatives and at keeping his different worlds apart, an emotional distance and situational maturity needs to be reached first.
I doubt that Anne Sinclair had that emotional distance originally.
“When we say it’s not the money, it’s always the money; and when we say it’s the money, it’s always something else.”
A vice has a price too. Succumbing to one automatically makes the manipulator a lesser person. It is part of a person’s make-up that becomes visible to those sensitized to it.
This has unorthodox ways of coming to light.
I was sensitised, over many years, to the exact spot-on nature of the vice I saw clearly reproduced in Joseph Muscat.
To me he was transparent from the start.
A question of my nostrils flaring at the familiar identical smell of danger.
Knowing how long the awareness and consciousness takes to happen in third parties is the main factor that dictated my constant presence on this blog since May 2012 and then from October 2012: simply to warn everyone in the way I know best. What is happening is extraordinarily bad.
To me, this was and is pure undistilled evil.
I’d say survival instinct intervened between DSK’s public exposure and the impact of Anne Sinclair’s realisation.
Ever met DSK, Tabatha? Ritienne did. And she says he didn’t try anything. He was probably taking a breather between shags.
No, Baxxter. I don’t live my life through other people’s experiences. Just my own.
We all live our lives through someone else. That’s what business contacts are for.
Best not to generalise. Not all of us do.
Nafissa Diallo has opened a nice family restaurant in Manhattan.
Not a bad deal at all.