MICHAEL BRIGUGLIO – SENDING OUT MARXIST EMAILS IN SUPPORT OF THE CUBAN DICTATORSHIP
You can enlarge this image by clicking on it.
In 2007, when he was a Sliema councillor representing Alternattiva Demokratika, Michael Briguglio was busy sending out emails from his personal address (mikesbeat) in support of the Cuban Marxist regime – a REAL dictatorship.
Then a few months later, in the 2008 general election – when he was still an AD politician – he voted No. 1 for Labour. This because he knows my arguments about voting to choose a government are correct: by his own admission, he voted No. 1 for Labour because he wants a Labour government, even though he is an AD politician.
He will probably be doing the same this time, while urging idiots to vote AD.
The greatest irony is this: all the witterers who are talking about a ‘Nationalist dictatorship’, when what they are referring to is a government democratically elected by popular mandate every five years, are planning to show their resentment against this ‘dictatorship’ by voting for Michael Briguglio, a man WHO SUPPORTS THE OPPRESSION OF PEOPLE BY CASTRO’S MARXIST DICTATORSHIP IN CUBA.
I’m sorry, but I really have to say this: kemm intom nies ridikoli, jahasra.
12 Comments Comment
Leave a Comment
Proset Daphne for exposing yet another facciol. How do these people do it? I try to imagine their parents as different from them, but I can’t. What filth.
However there are those who trust him. I heard about someone who is voting for him because he wants gay marriage.
Don’t these people realise that no matter how much they wish for something to happen there is simply no way it will materialise? Even if elected, AD will be powerless in most cases.
Water melons, green on the outside, red on the inside. Environmental issues are just a veneer and a cover for something else.
It’s inverted snobbery mixed with a strong dose of conceited bigotry.
I’ve had a couple of instances where an argument would be met with uncalled for bouts of rage.
They have a major issue with their personal limits resorting to condescendence or colonial spite.
They also make extremely boring and uncouth dinner guests, just their little world and what they can manage in conversation.
No self-deprecating irony, no self-awareness, just upholding the alibi for the persona.
The common factor is a lacklustre professional competence.
Bloody socialists they are – nothing less.
[Daphne – You mean ‘nothing more.’]
Ghax ma jmurx joqghod f’Kuba la huwa daqhekk ferhan b’Fidel Castro u l-poplu Kuban?
Ghaliex iridu jaharbu minn Kuba n-nies Kubani? U jigi dal-pacluq u jfahhar ir-regim dittatorjali ta’ Kuba. Jew tal-Venezuela. Hallina pinnur u buffun.
1970s Malta was a lot like Cuba.
I love it how you are giving importance to AD.They must be worrying the PN !
A vote for AD means a vote for Labour – if you have an idea of how our electoral system works.
If you know then you should know that a vote for AD, yes, indeed, worries the PN. If you do not know, thwn shut up and try and learn from those who KNOW.
I’ve been receiving sample ballot papers with AD and Labour and the PN cut out. is this evidence of some sort of pact between the two? why else would Labour leave in AD and cut out PN only?
The bottom line is that AD cannot win the election so their electoral manifesto cannot be implemented. It’s as simple as that.
It is all very well to want AD to have a seat in Parliament but surely that should not take priority over who you want to lead the country. The choice to be made is between Gonzi and Muscat and their respective teams. Voting for anyone else is wasting your vote. With the system we have, the mould is not going to be broken. The system needs to be changed for that.
Having a seat in parliament when the Government of the day has a strong majority means precious little other than having your voice heard. If this is so important to you, it doesn’t need to be at the expense of choosing who should lead the country. One could give their no.2 to them after voting for a strong or a weak candidate whose votes are more than likely to be inherited.
Having said that, Briguglio has turned out to be a fraud. He is a Communist, no less. How could he vote for Sant who was so anti EU when the AD were actively in favour? What was the reaction of his colleagues like Cassola?
lol … you can write whatever you want. from sunday onwards …
“This is the end
Beautiful friend
This is the end
My only friend, the end
Of our elaborate plans, the end
Of everything that stands, the end
No safety or surprise, the end”
And your fridge magnet hero (poor Laurie) will be consigned to the dustbin of history…. yipeeeeee
These revelations should be published in the newspapers.