An unbelievably hot news item from the Labour Party's news site, today

Published: August 2, 2010 at 4:29pm

Madonna, how unprofessional – just look at this, from the Labour Party’s news site. What a truck-load of junk masquerading as a political party. Labour perfectly encapsulates the nationally pervasive attitude of ‘u ejja, mhux xorta’.

A. G. disagrees with views of DC Gossip?
02 August 2010 20:59

Update: It seems DC Gossip is a bad loser too. Today she stated that the AG’s office must be in cahoots with the PL Deputy Leader if the AG backed the PL stance? Now that’s democratic.

Michael Fazon clearly didn’t agree with her and branded the event on Friday as the most interesting of the day! The Times appeared to agree with DC Gossip though. They relegated this landmark judgement to page 3 and on page 1 told us how the divorce debate was conducted with dignity, how the deficit may be going down, with a back page talking point attacking Joseph Muscat for commenting on Dr. Gonzi’s other vote buying scandal..promising tax cuts which didn’t materialise.

In other words The Times acted as the wall again and didn’t give the AGs decision front page prominence as it would have done if the PL were in government perhaps? This bias should stop.

Earlier: It appears the A.G. has today struck a blow at the credibility of The Malta Independent’s leading columnist. Only yesterday she attempted to rubbish the credibility of those who made cogent arguments about vote buying in the last election. The A.G.’s arguments published today mirror the arguments made by the PL’s Deputy Leader in Parliament.

Dc Gossip wrong again. Whose credibility is in tatters? Perhaps the Independent should check the views of their columnist for fact, and dare we say independence too? Or read our own most read leader called “No Pradas in our polling booths PM” before they rushed to print her biased hot air.

Bottom line the A.G. is appealing the judgement given in the vote buying case. Watch this space…




30 Comments Comment

  1. Fontana says:

    My understanding – and thankfully I have scant experience of the Courts – is that an appeal can only be lodged n a point of law. Do you have any idea what the basis of the appeal is?

    The AG has a right to appeal on any or all cases so why they are viewing this as a landmark judgement is beyond me – il-vera you can fool most of the people most of the time methinks!

  2. Jason il-Firillu says:

    “02 August 2010 20:59”

    They really think they are the party of the future. Just take a look at the time 20:59 and now its only 17:04 !

    On second thoughts they probably need an IT guy to change the clock on their computer.

    • Grezz says:

      If they need an “IT guy” to change the clock on their computer, then they’re absolutely hopeless at doing more serious things, such as running the country.

  3. Pat says:

    Love the mix of punctuation and capitalisation.

    A.G./AG/AGs/A.G.’s, DC Gossip/Dc Gossip.

  4. Anthony says:

    It is pretty obvious that they do not know what a landmark judgement is.

    This is not surprising given that there are a good seventeen letters in just two words.

  5. H.P. Baxxter says:

    If I were able to understand what that article is trying to say, I would comment. But I can’t.

    • Magrin says:

      Don’t bother. August must be the silly season in Malta. I know, I was born there in this month.

    • Mini-Tiananmen square says:

      I take it that even if you wouldn’t understand you still post a comment.

      – just a friendly remark

  6. Bus Driver says:

    Fontana, according to a report, headlined on page three a couple of days ago as I recall, in The Times, AG appeal is based on a key ‘wetness’ not having been heard by the court.

    Labour governments have been bad news for the nation since the early fifties when Mintoff first stuck his finger in, with his incompetent act followed up by KMB and Alfred Sant.

    ‘Wetness’ the drop in employment in the private sector that invariably followed successive Labour governments. What Mr Bartolo is said to have told his employee was not a threat, but a plain statement of proven fact.

    The problem with PL as a whole, and with Anglu Farrugia in particular, is that unless they come to realise that they, in themselves, are nothing but bad news and that they would do everyone including themselves a favour by copping out, the Labour Party cannot ever redeem itself. It is destined to remain as a bad and inept opposition, and a disaster for the entire nation should it end up in government. In other words a permanent plague on society from whichever angle one looks at it.

  7. Mario Frendo says:

    Yeah and when I first read that article, I was like who the hell is DC.

  8. marco desira says:

    Pity you had to start with “Madonna” …. you could have put that word to much better use

    • Brian says:

      Would ‘Madoffi’ do for you Mr. Desira?! It’s what comes before the name of the Blessed Virgin that names our religion in vain. May I ask you this and do kindly reply….how many times have you heard the Lord’s name in vain …..and intervened?? Take a stroll to our Law Courts and down Republic Street in Valletta or how about a village festa…Now that’s where YOU should tell off people to refrain from naming our Lord’s name in vain.

  9. vaux says:

    This is hot!
    Quote “Dr Herrera said that although it was not a nice thing for anyone to hit his girlfriend, she was not in ITU”…. today’s Times of Malta Tuesday, 3rd August 2010 – 15:00CET…..Man accused of punching girlfriend
    I am speechless.

    The Honorable Member of Parliament owes the public an apology or an explanation.

    Mela vera tilfna il-boxla jew!

  10. Albert Farrugia says:

    As far as I know the AG will routinely appeal a judgment as long as he is expressly directed not to by those politically responsible. Obviously the government would not interfere in this case….

  11. Victor says:

    Well said Marco Desira !

  12. Bus Driver says:

    Alfred Bartolo: Government, even if it chose to, cannot interfere in the functions of the AG. The AG is independent, as is the judiciary. AG acts solely on the merits of each individual case. Judgements are not ‘routinely’ appealed by AG. Appeals are only raised where valid grounds exist.

  13. The Colonel's Pooch says:

    Speaking of hot news items:

    (1) The Colonel is worried about the environmental damage from a potential oil spill (yeah right);
    (2) The Colonel thinks that all immigrants are liars;
    (3) The Colonel scrimps on a card and send Dom his birthday greetings.

    My, dear Joseph, what diplomacy, what statesmanship.

  14. red nose says:

    Vaux, Dr.Herrera as defence counsel has to hang onto anything, even a straw. Do not blame him – he was trying his best – as is his duty – to get his client off the hook.

  15. Tonio says:

    Let’s be grateful for small mercies. They spelt “loser” correctly…

  16. Andrea Muscat says:

    Is it me or is this a totally laughable, utter crass piece of ‘writing’?

    I can’t find a single sentence that’s good enough.

    ‘This bias should stop’ (??) And you should find another job!

    ‘Michael Fazon’? Seriously?

  17. Tonio Farrugia says:

    “Cogent arguments|”.
    What’s cogent about them?

  18. C Falzon says:

    I see they still have a surplus of question marks? Or maybe they don’t know how to write a question?
    Anyway A.G is appealing the judgement so A/F (I.G) must be right no ? And D/C g must be wrong no ?

  19. Salvu Felice Pace says:

    “with a back page talking point attacking Joseph Muscat for commenting on Dr Gonzi’s…..”
    Now it so happens that I wrote that Talking Point but Malta Star editor is incapable of understanding the difference between attacking someone for commenting and attacking the comment. Too subtle for him.
    By the way I tried to find the article this evening to send my comment, but it has been taken away. If I’m right, I wonder why?

  20. red nose says:

    We have to remember that tragically, the vote of a person who can spell has exactly the same value of the vote of a person who cannot spell correctly.

  21. Silvio Farrugia says:

    Do you not remember the recent court judgment when the PL media was ordered to pay about euro 50,000 for infringing copyright on music? Is this the way they will govern? What a bunch of amateurs.

  22. Brian says:

    Hmmmm. Translating what the labour party (and no capitals pls.) meant to say is this…..Dear DCG, please stop being a thorn in our arse….it really hurts!
    Well, tough shite dear J.M. & Co., DCG is here to stay ( not that I agree with her comments all the time) However……what DCG represents is, DEMOCRACY (wish I can underline it too!). The afore mentioned word, for the new l.p. or m.l.p. or whatever this so called new image political party represents has no meaning….cause it’s a taboo word for them.

Leave a Comment