Small stakes, vicious fights

Published: January 6, 2011 at 11:28pm

When I grow up, I want to marry a Maltese MP and live in the height of luxury. If that doesn't work, I'll try to nab Roman Abramovic off Dasha. She'll be a hag by then.

Henry Kissinger famously said that university politics are so vicious precisely because the stakes are so small. He could have made the same observation about Maltese politics (or Maltese journalism, but that’s another story).

I can’t help thinking of Kissinger’s words when I read the insults flying across the barricades in the Great MPs’ Salary War. The members of parliament who have decided to donate their salary increase to charity speak to the newspapers as though the relatively paltry amount will save Africa or find a cure for AIDS.

Clearly, their Christian education hasn’t extended as far as the bit where those who give are instructed to do so in silence, communicating the information to nobody, and that boasting automatically devalues and degrades any act of charity.

Christianity, Pharisees and coins aside, that kind of vulgar boasting about personal ‘generosity’ is crass and irritating. Instead of coming across as the boaster intends – “oh, look how generous I am” – it merely appears self-seeking, oddly, in a way that grabbing the raise and banking it does not.

Then there are those who are mesmerised at the thought that a minister of the state might be earning €90,000 a year. They have thronged the internet to voice their envy and objections. Are they still thinking in liri and are they a little bit confused, perhaps? That’s €90,000, not Lm90,000. For those who want it in liri, it’s around Lm38,000. If they think that’s a disproportionately high salary for that kind of job, then they’ve spent too long in their village, cut off from reality, while busy accusing politicians of living in the ivory towers they inhabit themselves.

In those ivory towers, there is apparently no income tax and national insurance, because the way these people talk, you’d think the recipients of those salaries, which are big only by Maltese village standards, are taking home their €90,000 and using them to bathe in asses’ milk, the price of which would come down immediately if the new Renzo Piano building were to include an automatic milking system.

I’m not going to sit here working out how much each and every minister pays in tax and national insurance, because it depends on so many variable factors, but on average the Treasury is going to keep roughly a quarter of those €90,000 and possibly rather more in some cases.

That makes it a whole lot less scintillating.

I’m not saying this to defend the salary increases that ministers and members of parliament have got. I don’t think they need defending because they are entirely justified. Their salaries before were rubbish. They were one big reason why we found ourselves having to choose between such junk contenders in general elections, who see parliamentary work as a part-time activity in between creaming in their main income from their professional practice.

So no, I’m saying it because I am not a communist and the earnings of others do not exercise me. What I find upsetting is the reminder from time to time that in these minuscule islands of small stakes and peculiarly vicious battles, the idea that others might be earning a reasonable sum provokes such hatred and consternation even among those who earn reasonable sums themselves.

Few seem to understand that members of parliament must be compensated not only for the work they do while actually members of parliament, but for what they must do to get there – that whole ghastly carnival of setting out your stall while crawling, creeping and backstabbing for votes, losing your privacy and quite often your peace of mind.

Yes, most of them love it, which is why they do it. But that is precisely the point: with poor salaries we get the sorts of people who get off on the thrill and the kudos of being a village elder and who find those dubious things reward enough. It is too idealistic to say that those who go into politics shouldn’t do so for the money but for the public service factor. We’re not talking charity and volunteering here, so the financial compensation must be adequate.

The smaller the stakes, the more vicious the battles, and it is a particularly depressing thought that our political parties and members of parliament are tearing each other apart over an MP’s salary (not a minister’s salary, which is different) that is roughly what a new graduate earns as a starting salary in London.

European Union or not, our minds and spirit are still in Lilliput. I watch the scathing battle over these salary increases, and I can’t help thinking of starving people scrabbling for crumbs and killing each other to get at them. Whatever we like to think, we are inevitably the cultural and genetic descendents of desperate people fighting to stay alive on a barren, dangerous and inhospitable piece of rock, prepared to do each other in for a turnip.

This article is published in The Malta Independent today.




10 Comments Comment

  1. Hot Mama says:

    Charity is like sex: it should be done in private.

    Welcome back, Daph! You were sorely missed.

    All the best for 2011.

  2. Rover says:

    Daphne, good to have you back.

    I have no qualms with MPs and ministers earning a decent salary for the amount of work they do. What irks me is the number of MPs we have for such a small country – 69 when I’m sure 49 would be more than enough.

    If the governing party had to be short of ministerial expertise, then they could easily hire from the private sector. Then again I doubt whether Eur90,000 would be enough reward for the right candidate.

    [Daphne – EUR90,000 is what ministers earn, and not MPs.]

  3. You said “Their salaries before were rubbish. They were one big reason why we found ourselves having to choose between such junk contenders in general elections, who see parliamentary work as a part-time activity in between creaming in their main income from their professional practice.”

    Frankly I think that this will only boost junk contenders next time round. The increase definitely won’t improve the current lot.

    Most of the people whose mind it crosses to vie for a place (these people think in terms of “places” not “seats”) in parliament come from an “arani ma ilhaqt avukat/nutar/perit/ tabib” background. They want to be big fish in a small pond. No amount of money thrown at them will ever make them “statesmen”

    If it were up to me I’d only allow persons who have successfully managed their own business for a minimum of ten years to be eligible for parliament.

    • red nose says:

      I think that it is time for people to read about Nerik Mizzi, Giorgio Borg Olivier, Lord Strickland. They will soon understand that dedicating one’s life for the benefit of the country, is , OR SHOULD BE, the aim of all honest politicians.

  4. Pip says:

    Very well said and I agree with you entirely.

    Admittedly, the announcement was clumsy and the timing unfortunate, but it does not justify this level of criticism especially from those who should know better.

    What has become increasingly irritating, and we have to be prepared for a double dosage as the election draws closer, is the constant repetition of the same stale arguments every time there is an increase in the price of something or other. Then the Piano project gets a mention etc. etc.

  5. cikku l-poplu says:

    Welcome back, Daph!

    Din tas-salarji tal-ministri l-ononarja tal-MP’s hija xi haga ta’ min jahseb fuqha b’certu serjeta u mhux kif ghamel J.M.li kif jidher lanqas lil shabu M.P.’s ma ikkonsulta.

    Wasal iz-zmien li M.P.s taghna jkunu ta’ kalibru li jixraq lil Malta fl-Europa u biex ikollok gererazjoni gdida ta’ M.P.’s li jistaw jikkontribixu bi professjonalita ghal gid tal-pajjiz dan ma tistax thallashom bil karrawett.

    Issa huwa iz-zmien fejn il partiti politici jibdew iffitxu kandidati godda ghal elezzjoni li gejja u jekk inriddu li jkollna membri parlamentari ta’ valur u li jkunu jafu w jifmu xi jkun ghaddej fil-parlament dawn trid thallashom kif xieraq inkella ser nibqaw naraw u nisimaw hmerijiet kif qed nassistu bhalissa.

    Nixtieq inkun naf kif J.M.ser jersaq lejn kanditati godda u ta’ stoffa u joffrilhom biex johorgu mal-P.L.bl-onorarja li ghandhom illum ghax b’dan il hlas xi hadd li jhawwad fl-endoskopija issib.

  6. Angus Black says:

    I just can’t wait until Joseph Muscat solemnly declares that IF he ever becomes prime minister he will immediately reduce the ministers’ and MPs’ salaries to what they were before.

  7. Anthony Farrugia says:

    It appears that the PL has known at least since last April of these increases, and it is not as they stated, that they found out from a parliamentary question few weeks ago.

  8. Silvio farrugia says:

    It seems only you in Malta is not fuming about the ministers’ and MPs’ rise…remember the MPs are STILL part time, some of them are never there, they have a special pension (when my father’s was stolen because he had a British service pension ) and other perks.

    They award themselves a rise (where in the world) as they think they are God’s gift to Malta. I actually agree with the MINISTERS’ rise but not with the MPs’.

    Still the timing is very bad as if it was done to hurt us all. There should be 40 MPs in the House for such a small country. These people should realize how low they are thought of by the people instead of believing they are special.

  9. woman from the south says:

    The Labour Party’s donation to charity reminds me of a woman I meet regularly at a grocer. She is always grumbling about the fact that “uff” her husband wants to go to Rome again, “Uff we are invited to the opening of such and such a place/exhibition”.

    It took me a while to understand (silly me) that she is actually boasting.

Leave a Comment