This would have made more sense had it not been so provincial.
It’s more of a dissenter’s lament, than a dissident’s exposé.
It’s the stuff of parochial revolutionaries, with no inkling of what lies beyond our shores or who truly governs us (and therefore bereft of the truths that matter most – which is why a Napoleonic Franco Debono calls on the EU Commission to intervene and rid us of the “Evil Clique”: http://www.francodebono.com/2012/08/10/motto-of-the-evil-clique/
Fighting corruption and intellectual fascism at a local level is all well and good, but at the very least you’d need facts and objectives, not rhetoric and banality. And you’d still need to see the (much, much) bigger picture.
Bottom line: Franco Debono reminds me of the time when, as a child, I used to listen in on the Valletta chatter ghand tal-grocer as I patiently waited for my turn.
Your investments in kitchen sinks should do fine, Purdie, and may you never come to rely entirely on your Swiss or Canadian pension.
Now, I’m sure your savings are not in collapsing fiat currencies or treasury bonds, but stuffing a garage with kitchen sinks would be a sound way of saving in durable commodities.
It’s fascinating to watch a middle aged, supposedly well-educated man mentally implode on public social media, all of his own volition. A classic case for the Journal of Psychiatry.
One of the reasons why the P.N. has lost the support of the majority is surely Franco.
Not because of what he did and is still doing but because many P.N supporters ask, how come Franco was so popular and now he is what he is?
Who made the mistake of accepting him as a candidate in the first place? What makes us so sure that there are no more Francos in the P.N.?
Could this be the reason why the party is in such a mess?
Could it be the party is appeasing the other Francos, which might be the reason why the P.N. has so many arrogant and unthouchable officials. No need to name them.
You can change the Francos to Pullicino Orlandos.
How could they have fooled the party all this time?
Or was is that we were in the same position of accepting anybody in the same way you accuse the P.L of accepting anybody in their skip?
They are accused of being mental cases and I don’t know what else, but if so they must have been like this from the beginning but the P.N. needed them and anything goes as long as the party wins.
A good example is Pullicino Orlando. If Sant knew about he was up to at Mistra, is it possible the P.N. didn’t?
[Daphne – It is not only possible, it is fact that the PN found out from Alfred Sant. That much would have been obvious to you if you had read the transcript of Gordon Pisani’s telephone conversation with Pullicino Orlando. I happen to know for a fact that nobody in the Nationalist Party knew.]
Why did they convince us to vote for this corrupt candidate?
“Left click on the images to read them.”
doh! do we have to?
This would have made more sense had it not been so provincial.
It’s more of a dissenter’s lament, than a dissident’s exposé.
It’s the stuff of parochial revolutionaries, with no inkling of what lies beyond our shores or who truly governs us (and therefore bereft of the truths that matter most – which is why a Napoleonic Franco Debono calls on the EU Commission to intervene and rid us of the “Evil Clique”: http://www.francodebono.com/2012/08/10/motto-of-the-evil-clique/
Fighting corruption and intellectual fascism at a local level is all well and good, but at the very least you’d need facts and objectives, not rhetoric and banality. And you’d still need to see the (much, much) bigger picture.
Bottom line: Franco Debono reminds me of the time when, as a child, I used to listen in on the Valletta chatter ghand tal-grocer as I patiently waited for my turn.
‘Qarsatli nifs-nifs-kwart kunserva, Franco, hi. Ittijielix mit-tarf, ta… u doppja strazza…’
My goodness, Kevvy. To have such enlightening insight into the woes of the world while bent over the kitchen sink is truly admirable.
Your investments in kitchen sinks should do fine, Purdie, and may you never come to rely entirely on your Swiss or Canadian pension.
Now, I’m sure your savings are not in collapsing fiat currencies or treasury bonds, but stuffing a garage with kitchen sinks would be a sound way of saving in durable commodities.
?
Oh, when did conspicuously branded polo shirts become radical chic?
I recommend he take Klein’s No Logo with him next time he pops into parliament.
If there’s someone who has an obsession with convention, it’s Franco Debono.
Taste is a reflection of the soul, and what we see with him is a cliche’ of the go-getter, arriviste, yuppie.
Renault, Fiat or Volkswagen could literally drop him, loser, into their ads, as she walks away to get into her car.
By the way, Franco, sweet little number you drive, how many cupholders does it have?
The “psychology police” should send the men in white, strait jacket at the ready, to this crazy s. o. b.
Who are you to judge? With your permission I suggest we send the grammar police your way, unless ‘Antoniette’ (sic.) is your real name.
If he did not want people to judge him he shouldn’t have started a blog.
You are judging me too but that’s OK. My surname is not Costa though and I do not sing or write music.
It’s fascinating to watch a middle aged, supposedly well-educated man mentally implode on public social media, all of his own volition. A classic case for the Journal of Psychiatry.
Oh boy, does someone need serious help. Google ‘histrionic’, dottore.
Enough of Franco Debono’s blog. He’s tedious, repetitive and boring.
He can’t string two words together without making some grammatical mistake or other. He’s a nobody.
I know he’s threatening not to vote with the government but well, can we do anything about it?
Life will go on, we’ll have a Labour government and true, a national crisis to go with it, but really that’s all. (Oh f***!)
One of the reasons why the P.N. has lost the support of the majority is surely Franco.
Not because of what he did and is still doing but because many P.N supporters ask, how come Franco was so popular and now he is what he is?
Who made the mistake of accepting him as a candidate in the first place? What makes us so sure that there are no more Francos in the P.N.?
Could this be the reason why the party is in such a mess?
Could it be the party is appeasing the other Francos, which might be the reason why the P.N. has so many arrogant and unthouchable officials. No need to name them.
You can change the Francos to Pullicino Orlandos.
How could they have fooled the party all this time?
Or was is that we were in the same position of accepting anybody in the same way you accuse the P.L of accepting anybody in their skip?
They are accused of being mental cases and I don’t know what else, but if so they must have been like this from the beginning but the P.N. needed them and anything goes as long as the party wins.
A good example is Pullicino Orlando. If Sant knew about he was up to at Mistra, is it possible the P.N. didn’t?
[Daphne – It is not only possible, it is fact that the PN found out from Alfred Sant. That much would have been obvious to you if you had read the transcript of Gordon Pisani’s telephone conversation with Pullicino Orlando. I happen to know for a fact that nobody in the Nationalist Party knew.]
Why did they convince us to vote for this corrupt candidate?
Give up, Silvio.
That, my friend, is hypocrisy spelled out for you.
Disagreeing with his eminence is moral violence?
Daphne, stop suppressing Franco’s way of dressing.