If you voted for Norman Lowell, Arlette Baldacchino or Antoine Galea, you voted for infanticide
These three freaks want to take a good look at babies after they’re born, and if they don’t like them, they’ll order them killed.
I’m a little tired of the way people detach themselves from the meaning of their vote or the fact that it is mandate for action – which is why it is called a vote for.
So I thought it’s time we started bringing people face to face with what their vote means.
If you voted for Imperium Europa, you voted for infanticide. Great going, and don’t boast about it unless you want to end up some kind of pariah.
Infanticide. Killing babies. Because we don’t like certain kinds of babies. Not abortion – we wait for them to be born, then we take a good look at them, and if we don’t like them, we kill them. Whether the mother, father, wants that or not.
What a thing to vote for. What a choice to boast about.
38 Comments Comment
Reply to Sparta Click here to cancel reply
Is this Sparta?
Vote Labour, get China.
Remember this? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/01/tiananmen-square-25-years-every-person-victim-massacre
Daphne, do you honestly believe that even one percent of the 7000 people who voted for Norman Lowell are in favor of infanticide ?
[Daphne – They must be, because they voted for it. And that is in fact how a vote is interpreted at law. That’s why it is called a vote for. You are presented with a set of things and when you vote, you vote for them all indivisibly.]
Even if Imperium Europa had 6 candidates and managed to win all of the 6 seats allocated to Malta something like infanticide would never, ever see the light of day.
People who voted for Norman Lowell did so because something needs to be done about illegal immigration on a European level.
[Daphne – Perhaps. But they also voted for infanticide. Hard to stomach, but an inescapable fact.]
Hunters didn’t vote for Cassola. Why should someone against killing born children vote for Lowell?
“People who voted for Norman Lowell did so because something needs to be done about illegal immigration on a European level”
Wrong. PN, PL and AD had proposals on what to do on a European level. Lowell wants to drown them.
It’s also that interesting if, as you rightly claim, Imperium Europa elected 6 seats they still wouldn’t be in a position to commit an infanticide, how exactly would they be in a position to drown the immigrants?
If you voted for a nutcase it does say a lot about you in the first place. How can one justify voting for someone so weird and so obviously a fraud and racist.
The fact that the prime minister sees voters for this person as merely “scared of a problem” instead of outwardly condemning it as purely racism also speaks volumes.
This is Sparta.
I don’t like babies like these three, can we dispose of them too?
Disgusting. It is worth noting that this kind of eugenics is not exclusive to Imperium Europa. Many Greens and Far-Left parties also believe in abortion up to 9 months and euthanasia.
Also, gender-selective abortion, or indeed abortions carried out on the basis of some ‘defect’, are also a form of infanticide. The former being mostly prevalent in the Third World and the latter being mostly prevalent in the West.
The fact that Imperium Europa says it whilst others believe it and use tree-hugging to hide their real agenda is just a case of the former being naive. Lying whilst slowly normalising something truly inhumane is much more cunning.
Yes… in some countries Christian Democrats approve of abortion. So check your facts before yapping.
No one “approves” of abortion. What they approve of is the right to carry out an abortion without being prosecuted.
If you can’t tell the difference between abortion, euthanasia and infanticide, you need to get your head checked.
So the difference really lies in the child still being fully inside then right? Partial birth abortion is ok then right? It is just a technicality, whilst trying to make a distinction between the worthiness of people based on race, gender or disability. It is wrong. No amount of air-brushing changes what is going on. And yes, infanticide is very similar to abortion particularly when performed up to 9 months, even if performed before birth.
Ray, thanks for stating the obvious. I would invite you to re-read my comment. Perhaps this time you will understand it.
Conscientious objection is also removed in many countries, and yes, wherever the Greens, Far-Left or Far-Right are in power this is more common.
Ray perhaps, seeing as you are so well-informed you would let us know of all the Christian Democrat jurisdictions where they are trying to introduce euthanasia, where conscientious objection is removed, where abortion up to 9 months has been actively sought by the Christian Democrat MPs and where reproduction is discouraged.
Pick up a Greens political newspaper some time, or indeed just watch that failure of a cartoon Captain Planet, indoctrinating children with inhumane ideology nice and early.
Because Lowell conveniently calls it “euthanasia” it doesn’t make it as such. It’s infanticide.
This should bring to their senses those who are offended when they are called racists or far-right sympathisers.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/czech-president-milos-zeman-gives-amazing-speech-about-islam-and-anti-semitism/
And there they go, crowing with delight:
Ziemel Hundredinch Ive been targetted too .. and my posts have been forwarded on malta police page …. seems we are under d radar … well , it just prooves that we made progress and traitors are trying to shut us down . DREAM ON
1 hr · Like · 2
James Sciberras I heard on the news yesterday that the Prime minister intends to make deals with Oman and that he is considering taking the necessity of a visa for them to come here. NICE!!, anybody heard anything?
1 hr · Like · 1
Ziemel Hundredinch I didnt hear that yet James Sciberras .. but I wouldnt be surprised
1 hr · Like · 2
Peter Floyd every one of us needs to work… we did progress in this election, so we are getting stronger and stronger….the more they talk against us, the stronger we get…..that is why they keep posting against us. because they are so angry that we are right….about the outing…….dont worry…I photo coppied every single word that was said about us, and how them bitches tried to use our personal photos against us…and handed them to right cyber ofice……keep it up guys and dolls…AVE.
1 hr · Like · 3
I DID NOT vote for Norman Lowell. I do not want to see anyone suffer…not even a mouse. I am against abortion….if I have a loaf I’m prepared to share it with anyone of any creed and colour…but, certainly, there is a limit to the number of immigrants we can take.
See it this way, push backs in the long run work out better for everyone including the immigrants themselves.
If there was a European consensus in favor of push backs, would be migrants would not risk the perilous crossing from North Africa to Europe knowing that they would be sent back.
By giving would be migrants hope, that IF they make survive and make it into Europe and be given free child care, medical care, lodgings, pocket money, mobile phones etc we are only encouraging them to risk the journey.
If it is war, oppression, persecution or poverty they claim to be fleeing from, there are plenty of underpopulated and peaceful democratic countries within the African continent. After all Africa is huge and does not consist only of Somalia, Sudan etc.
How is it better for immigrants? Muscat and Mallia tried that and it didn’t work.
@La Redoute
It didn’t work because:
A – A group of NGOs and some others along with the UNHCR successfully put a stop to it.
B – For it to work properly there has to be an agreement where every country enforces push-backs.
Australia practises push backs and we do not hear of so many drownings as we do in the Med.
A. The reason you don’t hear of people drowning near Australia is because dead people can’t speak.
B. Pushing boats back kills people far more than it saves them for the simple reason that people tend not to survive a boat sinking far from land.
Did you vote for Norman Lowell?
I cannot understand this reasoning. So sending men, women and children back to a country which is on the verge of lawlessness, where many of the women will end up being abused or raped, men guaranteed detention and their children no future is fine so it can serve as a deterrent to others. You call this being a human being.
This has nothing to do with the right to have an abortion.
Please, stop calling the killing of children who have been born already abortion.
They didn’t vote for infanticide any more than I voted for spring hunting when I voted for the Nationalist Party. It’s not as simple as that. You weigh all the factors, and then you vote for the party whose project comes closer to your aspirations.
They voted because of immigration. They didn’t bother to look up all the facts.
They voted because they looked at their healthy children and thought their children would be spared the terrible fate proposed by Lowell.
This is what it boils down to. Everyone seems to think that Lowell is advocating deportation, culling, and other nasty stuff for Someone Else. Or Someone Else’s wife, children, mother and father.
Me, I don’t vote for Lowell simply because my family and myself would be the first into the oven.
Call it selfish if you wish. I vote for the preservation of my kin. Isn’t that what Lowell preaches?
[Daphne – Here’s a little known fact: Norman Lowell has a disabled daughter.]
Blimey.
[Daphne – Yes, that’s right. Looked after by her mother, it goes without saying.]
He has a child with disabilities? My god, the man is mad.
I’m surprised you haven’t mentioned that in any of your articles (as far as I know anyway), would give many an even clearer picture of just what sort of man he is.
If Lowell’s dystopia comes to pass, he’d have to be the first into the oven – what with that low IQ, eunuch’s voice, swarthy skin, and inferior genes.
That “Daqshekk ghall-Immigrazzjoni Llegali f’Malta” page is hilarious. 99% of all the articles they post are debunked lies or urban myths. The dialogue they write there is beyond offensive. One only has to look at who its Admin is and what role he plays in Lowell’s political party.
To be fair most European countries allow abortion of severely impaired babies at any stage of gestation. So really, Lowell did not say anything earth-shattering. Check it out on this far-Left site:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6235557.stm
And your point is?
Lowell advocates aborting black babies but not allowing whites to do so. His stand on abortion is racist, not principled.
Don’t take it out of context. I saw the video where Norman Lowell talked about abortion and he never simply said “abort black babies”
He said a woman carrying a black rapists baby should be given the choice to abort the pregnancy.
In my personal opinion any woman pregnant after being raped by anyone, be he black, Nordic , Chinese or whatever should have the right to abort should she choose to do so.
The same goes for a woman who is expecting a baby with a mental or physical disability. Choice, not forced.
Lowell spoke of aborting black babies.
Why do you feel the need to justify Norman Lowell’s rants? You could just admit you’d made a terrible mistake when you voted for him.
Daphne,
I sincerely don’t think that anyone who voted for Imperium Europa agree with abortion, (or the killing of disabled babies).
I think most of the 7k votes are fit to be called ‘protest votes’, since most parties don’t have concrete action with regards illegal immigration. Even if Norman was elected, this policy would never be implemented. His European creed was against such immigration.
I think that he should still be given a platform since it is part of Democracy, and let the people decide what is violent or not.
If you think this is some sort of dark part of Maltese political history, i think you research Mintoff’s legacy. Cases of Socialist murderers or violent attacks on any one who disagreed with them.
See here: https://www.facebook.com/pages/What-do-you-want-to-name-this-page/638586119541651